Computation and Language
☆ Latent Reasoning in Continuous Space for Unified Multimodal Models NeurIPS 2026
Unified Multimodal Models (UMMs) achieve remarkable success on diverse multimodal understanding and generation tasks, yet they still struggle to effectively leverage language-based chain-of-thought reasoning for image generation. As a result, existing reasoning-augmented UMMs often fail to inherit the test-time scaling and fine-grained controllability observed in large language models. We attribute this failure to a fundamental modality mismatch: reasoning is performed in a discrete token space, whereas image generation operates in a continuous space. To bridge this gap, we introduce a Latent Reasoning framework in Continuous space (LARC), which alleviates the token-level bottleneck by reasoning over continuous hidden states. Specifically, the training framework consists of two stages: (i) curriculum supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and (ii) information-gain reinforcement learning (RL). First, the curriculum SFT stage gradually converts token-level reasoning into latent reasoning. Subsequently, the information-gain RL stage self-evolves latent reasoning without ground truth supervision. Experiments across diverse text-to-image generation benchmarks show that LARC consistently improves generation quality, prompt following, and compositional fidelity. Notably, LARC achieves state-of-the-art performance on GenEval with a 7%p gain over BAGEL and demonstrates clear test-time scaling behavior, outperforming token-based generation under both parallel and sequential test-time scaling strategies.
comment: Published as conference proceeding for NeurIPS 2026. Last two authors advised equally
☆ Flide: Accelerating Decision Inference with Exact State Forking
Decision models such as Jev have emerged as a highly promising paradigm for LLM agent systems, providing lightweight and reliable categorical reasoning for rapid System One execution. However, existing generation-oriented inference engines fail to support these workloads effectively, suffering from severe prefix recomputation overheads or distorted output probabilities. To address this challenge, we propose Flide, an efficient and exact inference engine that decouples the logical tree structure of a decision request from its physical execution within a single flattened token stream. Through ForkAttention, Flide navigates request dependencies using GPU-resident indices across both standard attention and recurrent Gated DeltaNet layers, guaranteeing in exact arithmetic that every query branch evaluates identically to an isolated forward pass. By expressing branch topologies directly in GPU-resident metadata, Flide accommodates diverse request mixtures with a compact set of pre-recorded execution graphs while enabling expanding agent histories to resume from checkpoints saved in earlier passes. Extensive evaluations on public hybrid and decision models demonstrate that Flide answers queries up to 9.5 times faster than vLLM and SGLang while staying closest to a float32 reference in total variation distance. By unifying physical execution throughput with mathematical exactness, Flide establishes a principled foundation for scalable, latency-critical decision intelligence in agent systems.
comment: 20 pages. Project page: https://flide.org
☆ DecisionRank: On-Policy Distillation for Decision-Model Rerankers
Yanran Wu, Dian Yu, Chongyang Bai, Jieyi Zhang, Rui Liu, Tianyi Chen, Shike Mei, Hang Cui, Frank Shyu, Sandeep Pandey, Luke Simon, Chunwei Liu, Xi Liu
Decision models target structured tasks by directly predicting choices or scores, avoiding autoregressive decoding latency. However, transferring a generative LLM's ranking knowledge to a decision model remains challenging: the teacher expresses preferences through a ranked list of document ID sequences, while the student determines the ranking using scores from the first-token position. To bridge this gap, we introduce DecisionRank, a decision model trained through item-space on-policy distillation (OPD). Item-space OPD constructs the student's rollout by sorting its document scores into a ranked sequence. A generative teacher takes the resulting ranking list as inputs and provides conditional feedback to directly supervise those scores. Combined with offline ranking supervision, DecisionRank achieves state-of-the-art performance on both general and reasoning-intensive retrieval benchmarks such as TREC DL, BEIR, and BRIGHT. Across four benchmarks, item-space OPD consistently outperforms alternative training objectives. Even at 1.7B parameters, DecisionRank surpasses its 27B generative teacher on TREC DL19--23. At 8B, it outperforms its generative listwise counterpart while running $24.5\times$ faster on TREC DL and $16.7\times$ faster on BRIGHT.
comment: 25 pages, 8 figures
☆ Subquadratic Attention with a Hierarchical Tree-Structured Indexer
Leon Lufkin, Cutter Dawes, Alexander Speicher, Kamesh Krishnamurthy, Tomás Figliolia, Beren Millidge
The quadratic scaling of attention is a fundamental bottleneck limiting the long-context capabilities of large language models (LLMs). A variety of approaches have attempted to circumvent this, but they either fail to match attention's expressiveness (e.g., sliding-window or linear attention variants with fixed-size state) or only achieve constant-factor speedups (e.g., sparse attention methods whose indexers themselves scale quadratically). In this paper, we derive an asymptotically subquadratic sparse attention method based on a hierarchical, tree-structured indexer, which we call Zyphra Hierarchical Attention (ZHA). ZHA constructs a tree of recursively compressed key summaries over the KV cache, which future queries traverse from the top down to retrieve a sparse subset of keys. Crucially, by iteratively growing the tree's depth, the total cost including routing and final attention grows sublinearly in sequence length, resulting in overall subquadratic (but superlinear) scaling for attention. We demonstrate that ZHA can be cheaply applied to existing pretrained models with only a short KL distillation training stage over a few billion tokens, and maintains performance on long-context retrieval and challenging reasoning, mathematical, and agentic coding evaluation tasks. Moreover, we show that our method is highly robust to tree geometry including very deep trees of up to 6 levels. Finally, we develop a detailed performance model and show that our approach scales subquadratically, dramatically outperforms competing methods beyond 1 million context, and ultimately has the potential to extend effective context windows to the hundreds of millions or billions of tokens.
comment: 43 pages
☆ RangeSWA: Training-Free Length Extrapolation for Continuous Diffusion Language Models
Continuous diffusion language models show promising potential in text generation tasks, but are prone to problems such as text repetition, semantic drift, and generation quality degradation when the generation length exceeds the training length. To address these challenges, we propose RangeSWA, a training-free length extrapolation method. The method combines local sliding-window attention, remote block summaries, and dynamic content retrieval to preserve local details and support long-range context access. In addition, generation degradation caused by length extrapolation is mitigated through positional remapping, conditioning attention correction, and denoising-stage-adaptive window scheduling. We conducted experiments on multiple continuous diffusion language models, and the results show that RangeSWA can effectively reduce generative perplexity and text repetition rates in long-text generation.
☆ The Knowledge Layer Model (KLM): Evidence-Visible AI Output, Routing Diagnostics, and Negative Results
AI answers require more than apparent correctness: reviewers need to inspect their recorded basis. We introduce the Knowledge Layer Model (KLM), an open, implementation-neutral specification for inference records with versioned epistemic assessments, evidence relations, and explicit unknowns. SEDIM, the knowledge and evidence architecture of Nage AI OS, is a reference implementation. We reference KLM v0.3 (repository tag v0.3.0). Empirical material consists of separate internal experiments, not end-to-end validation. A historical platform-domain routing benchmark reports 137/150 classifications across 15 classes (91.3%; nominal 95% Wilson interval 85.7-94.9%); the numerator is recovered from a rounded summary, and historical example membership is unverified. A native-model weight-path configuration yielded 0/15 successful answers in a corrected two-source test. A capacity-growth comparison could not establish a reliable effect because of a defective legacy scorer and missing original outputs. Lexical and scoped diagnostics each yielded AUC 0.008 for silent-versus-contradicted examples, below the registered minimum of 0.65. Legacy packing lost gold-containing text in 118/221 selected cases; repaired packing retained it in 221/221. These measure text presence, not answer quality. Python and TypeScript verifiers reportedly agreed on six checks per synthetic fixture; a separate production disclosure was not accepted. Restoration, re-derivation, human-rubric support, boundary isolation, and bounded-response evaluations remain proposed. Findings are internal and author-reported; historical observations are distinguished from later reproductions. Evidence visibility does not establish correctness, causal reliance, security, or regulatory compliance. Independent replication and a complete public audit package remain future work.
comment: 47 pages, 1 figure, 14 tables. Includes Appendix A
☆ PersonaChatBench: Evaluating Chat Assistants with Diverse Simulated Users
Zheyuan Deng, Taoran Li, Jingwen Zhang, Yuante Li, Dachuan Zhao, Fulei Zhang, Yunkai Zhang, Zhikun Xu, Yajie Liao, Haichao Zhang, Haodi Hu, Cong Wang, Chen Yang, Siyang Wu, Defu Cao, Xu Hu, Haoming Li, Haixin Wang, Robert George, Weizhi Zhang, Yuchu Wang, Zhejian Peng, Yueying Li, Wanting Jiang, Shushu Liang, Zhiyuan Yu, Yifan Wang, Jintao Huang, Yijun Wang, Yuexing Hao, Xiaomin Li
Conversational assistants are expected to help people with diverse backgrounds, preferences, and communication styles. Yet evaluations centered on a single cooperative user provide limited insight into how reliably an assistant serves users with different personas. We introduce PersonaChatBench, a framework for evaluating task competence and responsiveness to diverse user needs. PersonaChatBench pairs the same underlying task with multiple simulated users, each guided by a private persona card that specifies distinct needs, preferences, and interaction behaviors. By holding the task fixed while varying the user, the framework examines how assistant performance changes across user conditions. We evaluate 20 language models across six domains, separately assessing native task outcomes, fulfillment of expressed persona needs, and simulator fidelity. Our results show that task performance and need fulfillment vary across personas and domains. Strong task performance does not necessarily translate into satisfying individual needs, and models' relative strengths in meeting those needs are not consistent across domains. PersonaChatBench makes these differences measurable, revealing gaps obscured by aggregate scores and helping identify which users an assistant serves well and where adaptation is needed. It provides a basis for evaluating consistency across users and guiding the development of assistants that better accommodate diverse needs in everyday applications.
comment: 74 pages, including appendices
☆ CRoS: Causality Reward on Scrambled CoTs Improves Accuracy and Reasoning Faithfulness
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become the standard method for training language models to reason. However, RLVR typically relies solely on outcome correctness, which does not guarantee that the CoT causally contributes to the final answer. Without this connection, outcome rewards may fail to reinforce high-quality reasoning. Existing causality metrics assess CoT causality by perturbing the CoT, such as deleting reasoning steps or injecting errors, and measuring changes in the final answer. However, these perturbations inevitably alter information in each step. Consequently, high causality scores may reflect sensitivity to information changes introduced by perturbation rather than true causality. Such confounding effects further induce undesirable reasoning behaviors when these metrics are used as training rewards, including generating less informative CoTs and reducing exploration and self-correction. To address this problem, we propose CRoS (Causality Reward on Scrambled CoTs), a novel CoT causality metric that perturbs the order of reasoning steps without altering content, thereby preserving information within each step. On Reasoning Gym with Gemma-3-4B, CRoS outperforms existing causality and outcome rewards in out-of-domain accuracy, CoT quality, and CoT faithfulness. Specifically, CRoS achieves 46.8% accuracy on five unseen logic and games datasets, outperforming the strongest baseline (43.8%). It also achieves better CoT quality, consistently outperforming baselines in CoT-Pass@K from K=1 to 128, averaging 43.4% vs. 41.4%. For CoT faithfulness, CRoS achieves a hint acknowledgment score of 34.0% vs. 20.2%.
comment: 17 pages, 3 figures, 14 tables. Project page: https://xxiaoyuuuu.github.io/CRoS-Page
☆ Asynchronous Flow Map Language Models
Chanhyuk Lee, Wonjung Kim, Patrick Pynadath, Jaehoon Yoo, Satoshi Hayakawa, Ruqi Zhang, Jinwoo Kim, Seunghoon Hong
The order in which tokens are predicted in language modeling has a profound impact on the quality of generated sequences. Autoregressive and masked diffusion models iteratively fill in tokens and can exploit such orderings across generation steps, but how to leverage an ordering for one-step parallel language modeling is unclear. We introduce asynchronous flow map language models (aFMLMs), which incorporate prediction order into one-step modeling by learning the flow maps of asynchronous flows. These flows specify an ordering through a tokenwise time schedule that controls the relative denoising progress of tokens. We formulate a general class of asynchronous flows that admit both prescribed and learned, state-adaptive schedules, show that they define valid flow maps, and develop new methods for their flow map distillation. The resulting models can generate all tokens in a single forward pass by internalizing the ordering encoded in the flow into their hidden computations. On Sudoku solving and code generation for GSM8K math word problems, aFMLM establishes new state-of-the-art one-step performance.
comment: Code available at: https://github.com/david3684/async-fmlm
☆ TurnTurk-GPT: Text-Based Turn-Taking Prediction for Turkish
This paper presents TurnTurk-GPT, a text-based turn-taking predictor for Turkish obtained by fine-tuning a Turkish GPT-2 model with the TurnGPT objective on synthetic and real dialogue, and evaluates it on real Turkish conversation against rule baselines, a zero-shot Turkish language model and a widely used multilingual end-of-turn detector. Evaluation uses word-level decision points on unpunctuated, lower-cased text approximating the output of streaming speech recognisers, recording-disjoint and speaker-disjoint folds, nested threshold selection and paired cluster bootstrap tests. TurnTurk-GPT outperforms the multilingual detector under both recording-disjoint and speaker-disjoint evaluation. It outperforms the zero-shot language model only when the test speakers occur in training; on unseen speakers the two are statistically indistinguishable. Removing the suffixes of the turn-final word reduces AP by up to 44%, against 2% for a sentence-internal word, locating the Turkish end-of-turn cue in verb-final morphology. Synthetic dialogue alone yields the weakest trained model, and when a speaker pauses the zero-shot and multilingual baselines remain close to chance. The model and the evaluation protocol are publicly released.
☆ Less Loss, Fixed Weights: Logit Corrections for Forgetting
When a language model is fine-tuned to follow instructions, or further pretrained on a new subject, it often gets worse at predicting standard web text. This is known as "forgetting." We ask whether this loss can be undone by simple, fixed adjustments to the model's final token predictions. Across 14 pairs of base and derived models, from 1B to 7B parameters, we fitted a fixed bonus or penalty for each token (a vocabulary bias), alone or together with a temperature. On text held out from correction fitting, the largest top-4K bias recovery estimate is under 10%, with loss conditional on the retained vocabulary. Combining the bias with a temperature recovers up to 36%. Models further pretrained on math lose the most and recover almost nothing. Finally, in a controlled simulation where a model is damaged at random, with no planted bias or temperature change, the bias-plus-temperature fix still recovers 29%. Most of the real-model loss increase stays out of reach of our restricted fits.
comment: 8 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables. Code and data: https://github.com/SeverinVisionary/prior-shift-diagnostic
☆ DAMI: Dual-Axis Memory Initialization for Enhanced Long-Context Retrieval in Gated Linear Attention
Linear attention scales linearly with sequence length, but its finite-state memory can limit long-context retrieval. In gated linear recurrences, memory retention depends on state decay, which is shaped jointly by gate parameters A_log and dt_bias and by input activations. In controlled Gated DeltaNet (GDN) experiments, both parameters remain highly correlated with their initial values after training, highlighting the importance of initialization. Therefore, we introduce Dual-Axis Memory Initialization (DAMI), which jointly configures these parameters before training. DAMI assigns geometric timescales across heads for varied retrieval distances and a low-high-low input-sensitivity profile across layers. A small activation sample calibrates the GDN-family implementation to match both behavioral targets without adding trainable parameters. Across GDN, KDA, GDN2, Mamba-2, and RWKV-7, DAMI improves average RULER-style retrieval accuracy by 5.29 to 16.71 percentage points over the corresponding random-initialization baselines. Performance on language modeling, commonsense reasoning, and 2K real-world retrieval remains broadly comparable to those baselines. Our code is available at https://speedai.com/research/dami.
☆ Aligning MLLMs with the Latent Structure of Human Cognition via Behavior-Derived Semantic Dimensions
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved impressive performance across a wide range of reasoning tasks, yet it remains unclear whether their internal representations and decision criteria align with the latent structure of human cognition. In this work, we propose a novel framework to align MLLMs with the multidimensional mental representations underlying human similarity judgements. We build on a previously established behavior-derived semantic embedding space, in which objects are represented along 66 interpretable dimensions derived from 4.70 million human Odd-One-Out (O1O) judgements. For each triplet, we infer the most salient decision dimension and convert it into a dimension-grounded linguistic rationale. This enables MLLMs to learn both the final choice and a justification consistent with the inferred behavioral criterion. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach improves model consistency with human similarity judgements while retaining competitive performance on standard multimodal benchmarks. Furthermore, using searchlight Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) on an independent fMRI Natural Scenes Dataset (NSD), we observe increased representational alignment between model and human. Ultimately, our findings point to a data-driven route for incorporating human cognitive structure into MLLMs alignment. The code is available \href{https://github.com/ening-open/cogalign}{here}.
☆ Completeness and Cost of Retrieval Structures for Multi-Tool Requests in LLM Agents
An agent that must call several tools to fulfill a request fails when the tool retriever omits any one of them, yet tool retrievers are mostly built and evaluated on queries requiring a single tool. We compare representatives of six retrieval structures (flat lexical and dense retrieval, LLM query decomposition, LLM-navigated hierarchies, server-then-tool matching, dependency graphs, and trained set-level retrievers) across two multi-tool testbeds: 345 AppWorld queries with expert dependency labels and 103 MCP-Bench tasks over 257 MCP tools. We measure completeness@k, the share of queries whose entire required tool set appears in the top k, alongside the LLM calls, tokens, and latency that each structure incurs at retrieval time. A motivating analysis on all 7,961 ToolRet queries shows that aggregate completeness mixes two regimes: completeness at 10 is .58 to .67 on single-target queries and .08 to .17 on queries with four or more targets, and the ordering of retrievers on single-target queries reverses on multi-target ones. Across the two testbeds, none of the compared structures that is untrained on the testbed and makes at most one LLM call per query completes more than 10% of AppWorld queries at k = 16. The two structures that do better incur different costs: a set-level retriever trained on 75 to 90 in-domain queries reaches .33 on AppWorld and .58 on MCP-Bench with no LLM calls, while an LLM-navigated hierarchy reaches .30 and .40 with a median of 31 to 38 LLM calls and about five minutes per query. Their failure modes also differ: the trained retriever mostly ranks the missing tools just below the cutoff, whereas the hierarchy finds the target API and stops before collecting its prerequisites. In a downstream check with the official AppWorld agent, tasks with a complete retrieved set succeeded 21 of 21 times, whereas incomplete ones succeeded 2 of 39 times.
comment: 17 pages, 3 figures, 9 tables
☆ How Much Can Tool Calls Reveal About You? Privacy Leakage from Tool-Call Traces
Large language model (LLM)-based agents interact with external tools through protocols such as the Model Context Protocol (MCP), producing tool-call traces that may expose behavioral signals about users. In this work, we systematically study the risk of user-profile inference from MCP tool-call traces, where observers infer user attributes from protocol-valid tool interactions without access to user conversations. We introduce PrivacyTrace, a benchmark containing 1,000 synthetic user profiles and 4,000 agent trajectories across four domains, generated with real MCP tools from 25 servers. Experiments with four mainstream LLM attackers show that tool-call traces enable a 26.25% attack success rate for profile inference, compared with 17.97% from prior-based guessing. Further analysis reveals that tool arguments and returned results provide the main trace-grounded evidence, while linking traces across sessions further amplifies profiling risk. These findings demonstrate that MCP tool-call traces can act as effective behavioral side channels for user profiling, motivating the development of privacy-aware mechanisms for agent-tool interactions. Code and data are available at https://github.com/AI45Lab/PrivacyTrace.
comment: 24 pages, 12 figures, 8 tables, including references and appendices
☆ Text as an Index for Zero-Shot Cross-Domain Knowledge Tracing
Knowledge tracing (KT) predicts a student's next response from their history. New platforms often have question texts but no response logs for training, motivating zero-shot cross-domain KT. Existing transfer and cold-start methods use question semantics, but cross-platform semantic discrepancies limit transferability. We propose TIZSKT, which separates behavioral sequence modeling from domain-local historical evidence construction and uses text as an index rather than a directly transferable predictive representation. The Mastery-Dynamics Encoder learns correctness dynamics without question identifiers or text embeddings. Domain-Local Question Addressing builds fixed question addresses using a frozen text encoder and an unsupervised per-domain projection. The Text-Addressing Kernel uses these addresses to aggregate the current student's previous outcomes into a question-specific historical correctness summary. Cross-Segment Continuation retains access to earlier responses without extending the behavioral encoder's input sequence. Evidence-Volume Read-Out preserves the total kernel mass discarded by normalization and combines its log-compressed value with the behavioral state and historical correctness summary to predict the next response. All trainable parameters are learned from source domains; target inference uses public question texts and the current student's observed history without target-domain training. Leave-one-domain-out experiments on three public datasets show that TIZSKT achieves the highest mean AUC and accuracy among evaluated baselines on all target domains. Ablations confirm the contributions of text addressing and cross-segment continuation.
comment: 10 pages, 5 figures
☆ SimXAI: A Simple Drop-in Layer Increases Interaction Quality and Understanding in Conversational XAI EMNLP 2026
Conversational explainable AI (ConvXAI) agents often use GUS-style architectures with separate modules for intent recognition, dialogue management, and template-based response generation. While faithful to the underlying XAI methods, these pipelines are hard to adapt and often struggle with context-dependent follow-up questions. We present SimXAI, a lightweight LLM-centric conversational layer that replaces these modules with a single tool-calling LLM that bridges access to existing XAI resources. Rather than a standalone agent, SimXAI serves as a modular interface that enables conversational access to external XAI resources. We further introduce an evaluation suite for single- and multi-turn parsing, faithfulness, and contextualization. Across existing and new datasets, SimXAI achieves strong function-selection accuracy and high faithfulness while better handling context-dependent requests. In a user study replacing only the conversational layer of TalkToModel, a representative GUS-based agent, users completed tasks more accurately and in fewer turn. Overall, SimXAI improves GUS-based design while preserving faithfulness and improving conversational quality.
comment: Accepted at EMNLP 2026 Findings
☆ Iterated Integrals as Lexical Fingerprints: Path Signature Embeddings for Lexical Similarity NeurIPS 2026
While sentence embeddings are primarily designed for semantic generalization, their latent geometry implicitly encodes surface-level lexical properties, a relationship that remains poorly understood. Shallow pooling methods discard word order, while deep Transformer models obscure these lexical alignments behind computational complexity and uninterpretable spaces. We propose constructing sentence embeddings via the path signature of Word2Vec trajectories, leveraging the iterated integrals of rough path theory to create representations that explicitly capture sequential and lexical structure in a geometrically tractable manner. Through extensive ablations spanning Word2Vec dimensions, signature depths, and PCA compression, we correlate embedding distances against five lexical string metrics: Levenshtein, Jaro-Winkler, word Jaccard, phoneme Levenshtein, and character TF-IDF. We reveal that while average pooling almost entirely fails to capture character-level edit distances, path signatures strongly align with them, with depth 2 signatures optimally balancing character and word-level sensitivities. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the critical lexical variance is concentrated in a highly compact PCA subspace, and unlike pooling, signatures structurally preserve and quantify word order. These findings establish path signatures not as semantic generalizers, but as rigorous mathematical lenses that explicitly encode discrete lexical structures and word order, offering an interpretable alternative to opaque deep learning for lexical tracking.
comment: accepted in NeurIPS 2026 LP4FM Workshop
☆ Peeling the Matryoshka: Extracting Ontological Structure from Retrieval Embeddings EMNLP 2026
Taxonomy construction is essential for knowledge-intensive NLP yet remains costly: clustering-based methods (i) need careful per-corpus tuning and yield unstable hierarchies, while LLM-based pipelines (ii) depend on expensive task-specific training that does not transfer across domains. We report an empirical finding that bears on both: in Matryoshka Representation Learning (MRL) embeddings, where each leading prefix is itself a usable, coarser vector, prefix length aligns with the coarse-to-fine granularity of gold taxonomies; shuffled- and reverse-dimension controls isolate the alignment to the learned early prefix dimensions. The pattern holds across three architecturally distinct MRL models. To test whether this regularity is usable, we introduce PEEL (Peeling Embeddings to Extract Latent ontologies): a minimal probe over these frozen embeddings, trained once with an order-embedding objective that represents hierarchy as vector containment; a minimum spanning arborescence then decodes taxonomic DAGs. Using only a concept vocabulary (no documents), PEEL recovers taxonomic DAGs with high structural fidelity on two OLLM benchmarks, transferring to a new domain with no target-edge supervision. The end-to-end OLLM pipeline, which jointly discovers concepts and induces structure from document corpora, is reported as a cross-task reference. Pre-trained retrieval embeddings encode a decodable granularity gradient; a minimal probe renders it as explicit parent-child (is-a) structure.
comment: Accepted to EMNLP 2026 (Main Conference). 13 pages, 6 figures, 7 tables. Code: https://github.com/Eunchan24/PEEL
☆ Stepwise-Querying: Distilling Reasoning without Access to Teacher Chain-of-Thought
Reasoning distillation is widely used to transfer the reasoning capabilities of large language models to smaller students through teacher-generated supervision. In the black-box setting, however, teachers may expose only final answers and brief solutions, leaving intermediate calculations and validity conditions unavailable and thus limiting the reasoning supervision available for distillation. We propose Stepwise Querying, which elicits step-specific explanations without requiring access to the teacher's internal chain-of-thought (CoT) traces. Independent queries to the same teacher request intermediate derivations, validity checks, and corrections for individual steps, the assembled solutions are then used for standard supervised fine-tuning. Across two teachers, two students, and four mathematics and code benchmarks, our method achieves the highest score in 14 of 16 comparisons with three baselines. We further introduce Stepwise Explanation Information Gain (SEIG), a diagnostic based on the log-ratio of a frozen student's probabilities of correct step completion under stepwise and global explanations. Analyses on GSM8K show that incorrect-answer trajectories can remain useful when they preserve valid intermediate reasoning, while further decomposition yields limited additional gains.
comment: 15 pages, 7 figures, including appendices
☆ Task Vectors Can Be Linearly Decomposed into Interpretable and Controllable Components
Task Vectors (TVs) provide a compact way to steer large language models, but they are typically treated as atomized directions merely extracted from hidden states, leaving their internal functional structure poorly understood. Motivated by prior work that decomposes in-context learning into Task Recognition (TR) and Task Learning (TL), we ask whether a single TV can likewise be decomposed into functionally meaningful components. We formulate a TR/TL-based decomposition from candidate-label unembeddings, separating each TV into TR, TL, and residual components, and try to optimize the TR and TL coefficients using Bayesian optimization for more effective intervention. We evaluate this formulation across multiple model families, classification tasks, and both instruction- and demonstration-based TVs. Across these settings, TR/TL-based optimization identifies intervention directions that outperform the original TVs. Although optimization over random directions can also improve performance, TR/TL-based search yields more reliable gains, particularly for instruction-based TVs. Moreover, isolated interventions on the decomposed components produce distinct logit-level effects that are consistent with their intended functional roles. Together, these results suggest that TVs are not monolithic steering directions, but can be decomposed into functionally meaningful components that support both interpretation and control.
☆ Leakage-Controlled Structure-Preserving Augmentation and Template-Aware Evaluation for Bangla Symptom-Based Disease Prediction
Bangla symptom-based disease prediction is commonly evaluated on a small, imbalanced structured benchmark containing many profiles that differ by only one or two symptoms. We test whether train-only asymmetric Bernoulli perturbation improves classification using 725 unique profiles spanning 85 diseases and 172 binary symptoms. Experiments use ten repeated real-profile holdouts and parent-grouped inner cross-validation. The 2 x 2 design separates augmentation from hyperparameter tuning, with exact duplication, random oversampling, class weighting, and SMOTEN as balancing controls. For Bernoulli Naive Bayes (BNB), the gain over tuned raw training does not withstand Holm correction, although BNB attains the highest mean accuracy (97.50%). The boosted-tree models benefit substantially: XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost improve by 18.10, 28.45, and 10.09 percentage points, respectively. A Hamming-distance audit places 91.0% of standard held-out profiles within one symptom bit of the training data. Accuracy decreases on a same-disease 1-bit-purged challenge; nevertheless, XGBoost and LightGBM retain large augmentation gains. We also evaluate robustness to missing and spurious symptoms and the faithfulness of BNB explanations. Overall, Bernoulli perturbation is useful for some model families, but benchmark accuracy should be interpreted together with template proximity.
comment: 6 pages, 5 figures, 5 tables
☆ From Training Exposure to Membership Evidence: A Controlled Study of OLMo 2
Whether a language model was trained on a document matters for copyright, privacy, and benchmark contamination. Yet most membership-inference (MI) evaluations on language models collect members and non-members after the fact, so success may reflect distribution shift and failure is inconclusive. We re-ran OLMo 2 1B's official 50-billion-token mid-training stage, replacing selected training chunks with documents from 7,814 pairs matched on domain and difficulty. For each pair, a coin flip determined which document was inserted and which was held out. The run released by the Allen Institute for AI (AI2) from the same seed saw identical data everywhere else and serves as the counterfactual. One exposure raises a previously unseen document's likelihood on average but rarely identifies it. Using the counterfactual as reference, the reference ratio has an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.767 but, with one threshold across domains, catches 3.8% of members at a 1% false-positive rate (FPR). In contrast, 13 matched pairs give a paired test 80% power at the 5% level to detect training on a collection, given same-domain non-members and a close reference. A reference trained with another seed recovers 92% of the counterfactual's AUC advantage over chance, whereas reference-free attacks stay within 0.07 of chance when pooled over domains. The full official post-training recipe, re-run on both models, leaves 89% of the average effect. Even with a closely matched reference, substantial document-level variability limits individual membership inference. We will release the checkpoints, per-token log-probabilities, and the evaluation documents; the code is available at https://github.com/ali-bana/OLMo-Twin.
comment: 20 pages, 11 figures. Code: https://github.com/ali-bana/OLMo-Twin
☆ UpLoop: Training Looped Transformers via Upcycling at No Extra Pretraining Compute
Looped language models can strengthen reasoning through repeated computation with shared weights, increasing execution depth without adding independent parameters. However, each additional pass increases training floating-point operations (FLOPs), making these gains more expensive to obtain. To address this cost, we propose UpLoop, a pretraining schedule that uses upcycling to train looped Transformers while exactly matching a standard dense baseline in final parameter count, total training tokens, and training FLOPs. Specifically, UpLoop begins with a shallow Transformer, progressively grows its depth by copying learned layers, and uses the computation saved early to support repeated execution of a shared middle block later in training. Experiments across model scales show improvements in language modeling and downstream performance, with the average score across 22 downstream tasks increasing from 22.99 to 27.52 at 1.3B parameters. These gains also extend to mathematical reasoning after supervised fine-tuning.
☆ GraphNIAH: A Benchmark for Long-Context Reasoning over Real-World Graphs
The needle-in-a-haystack (NIAH) benchmark was introduced as a test for measuring a model's ability to find small relevant facts within a very large body of input text. However, existing NIAH benchmarks each suffer from one or more of the following limitations: (1) reliance on synthetic data, so their evaluations may not generalize to real-world settings; (2) reuse of previously published datasets, leading to the risk of benchmark contamination; (3) dependence on manual annotation, which requires human effort to create and update data and is prone to future benchmark contamination; and (4) unrealistic simplification of long-context multi-hop reasoning where each next step is trivial given previous steps, while real-world reasoning often requires planning over multiple possible proof paths. To address these limitations, we introduce \Benchmark, a dynamic benchmark built from real citation relationships among scientific papers published after the evaluated models' knowledge cutoff date, which utilizes real-world information while ensuring no benchmark contamination. The fully automated benchmark construction pipeline samples representative subgraphs of the citation graph formed by these papers and converts each subgraph into a long-context QA example with a verifiable answer. We use GraphNIAH to evaluate eight LLMs from the GPT-5.6, Gemini-3, and Qwen3.5 families. We find that accuracy falls as questions require longer reasoning paths: at question depths of 16 and 32, the GPT-5.6 and Qwen3.5 models answer YES/NO questions no better than random guessing, mostly by answering NO; four of the eight models answer no counting example correctly, and the others model get worse as the subgraph size increases. These findings suggest that current LLMs often stop searching the citation relationships in their context before they reach the answer, even though every fact they need is in the context.
☆ Precision--Recall Trade-off on the Inference Level for LLMs in Grammatical Error Correction
Large language models (LLMs) have recently been adopted for Grammatical Error Correction (GEC), achieving strong performance via both full fine-tuning and prompt-based approaches. As probabilistic sequence models, LLMs expose inference-time parameters that directly modify token generation behavior; however, their potential for controlling GEC-specific trade-offs has not been systematically studied. In this work, we investigate decoding strategies for grammatical error correction. We show that the repetition penalty parameter enables controllable adjustment of the precision--recall trade-off at inference time, without modifying the model architecture, training procedure, or prompt. Through experiments on standard GEC benchmarks, we demonstrate that repetition-penalty-based decoding enables inference-time control of the precision--recall balance, conceptually related to methods previously proposed for sequence-to-sequence GEC models, such as Align-and-Predict Decoding (APD), while remaining simple and broadly applicable to existing LLMs that expose inference-time decoding penalties.
comment: 17 pages, 2 figures, 13 tables
☆ TSBPO: Tree-Structured Branching for Policy Optimization in Interactive Language Agents
Training interactive language agents from terminal outcomes poses three coupled problems: which task and state continuations to sample, how to assign delayed feedback to decisions, and how to aggregate token losses for multi-token actions. We present TSBPO, a tree-structured sampling-to-update paradigm that addresses these problems within one training loop. A likelihood-fitted Root/Branch allocator uses retained task and state evidence to target continuations likely to produce contrasting terminal outcomes under fixed rollout budgets. On the resulting replayed physical trees, trajectory advantages compare immediate sibling segments, while observation-group step advantages compare outcomes at matched task/observation states. The actor then sums clipped token surrogates over each complete response and normalizes across active turns, avoiding response-length averaging in the policy-gradient term. With a Qwen2.5-1.5B actor, fixed checkpoints obtain 97.79% seen and 96.64% unseen stochastic success on ALFWorld and an 81.07% per-episode success rate over six stochastic episodes for each of the 500 WebShop test goals. A WebShop step-term ablation yields 75.93% at the same update-100 evaluation; an ALFWorld aggregation comparison shows higher observed command validity with complete-turn weighting. These results support the evaluated training configuration on two interactive benchmarks.
☆ Does Reasoning Make Language Models Agree?
Language models face two opposing concerns: monoculture, in which models err in correlated ways, and multiplicity, in which equally accurate models make conflicting decisions. The rise of reasoning models has complicated this debate: On the one hand, reasoning may increase model agreement if models anchor on the same salient features or follow similar reasoning paths. On the other hand, stochastic reasoning traces may introduce additional branch points leading to more diverse predictions. We resolve this tension by distinguishing reasoning as an intervention from reasoning as an observed behavior. We compare agreement under controlled changes in reasoning effort with agreement across observed reasoning lengths, measuring both against the agreement expected from model accuracy. Across nine models from two developers and three classification tasks, enabling reasoning increases agreement between models evaluated on the same individuals. Yet the individuals who elicit longer reasoning traces receive less consistent predictions across models. Both patterns persist after accounting for differences in accuracy. Asking models to reason more thus promotes agreement, while observing them reason longer signals disagreement.
☆ When Steering Shifts Discourse: Identifying and Intervening on Discourse-Level Changes due to Activation Steering in LLMs
Activation steering is an inference-time technique used to control or modify the behavior, tone, or safety properties of a large language model (LLM) without retraining the model's weights or editing its input prompt, but simply by adding a vector to its residual-stream activations. However, activation steering also changes the generated text in unintended ways, unrelated to intended behavior change, that are not well understood. Prior work has measured these changes only through coarse signals such as perplexity. In this work, we show that steering systematically produces significant changes in discourse dimensions of the generated text, such as its formality, use of evidence, and ambiguity. We present a way of countering this by adding a second, complementary vector that targets the affected discourse dimension. This intervention restores about 78% of the unintended discourse changes while preserving the intended steering behavior in about 93% of the generations.
☆ GRIT: Gradient Masking for Visually Misgrounded Tokens in Text-Rich Reasoning WACV 2027
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has recently been extended to vision-language models (VLMs), yet its effectiveness remains limited for text-rich reasoning tasks. We highlight a key factor contributing to this limitation: models frequently arrive at correct final answers despite misperceiving visual information during intermediate steps. We define this phenomenon as Correct-but-Visually-Misgrounded Reasoning (CVMR). Because standard RLVR rewards only final-answer correctness, it fails to differentiate between properly grounded and misgrounded reasoning, reinforcing both equally. Through token-level analysis, we reveal that CVMR tokens exhibit distinct attention patterns that differ systematically from well-grounded ones. Based on this observation, we propose GRIT, a training framework that incorporates visual grounding into RLVR to mitigate the impact of CVMR. Furthermore, to address the lack of text-rich reasoning benchmarks that allow for systematic evaluation across text length and reasoning depth, we introduce GRIT-Bench. Experiments demonstrate that GRIT significantly improves both reasoning accuracy and grounding fidelity over existing RLVR methods.
comment: Accepted to WACV 2027
☆ Saidzoda-Tajik-LFM-2.6B: Adapting a 2.6B Hybrid Model to Tajik Tool Calling, and What Continued Pretraining Takes Away
Tohir Saidzoda, Nekruz Maxudov, Bedil Karimov, Abubakr Abdullozoda, Amin Jalilov, Jonibek Kishvarov, Rahmonali Sharipov, Mariyamkhon Shodyeva
We release Saidzoda-Tajik-LFM-2.6B, a Tajik adaptation of the 2.6B-parameter hybrid model LFM2.5-2.6B-Base, built for tool calling in Tajik on modest hardware. The recipe has two stages: LoRA continued pretraining (CPT) on 1,485,319 cleaned Tajik web documents for 3 epochs, then one epoch of supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on a mix of machine-translated Tajik tool calls, English tool calls kept as replay, and Tajik instructions. On a 174-item tool-calling test set built from BFCL v3 and machine-translated to Tajik, strict full-call accuracy on Tajik prompts rises from 20.69 for the base model to 64.14 (paired difference +43.45 points, 95% interval +35.2 to +51.7); a lenient parser that also accepts the base model's own call formats puts the base at 31.72. English shows no detectable change (76.55 and 77.24). Every CPT checkpoint scores zero: CPT removes the native tool-call format and, as the lenient re-scoring shows, part of the skill itself. Outside tool calling, accuracy on a Tajik knowledge benchmark rises from 28.0 to 35.0, Belebele Tajik shows no significant change, and English MMLU falls from 60.8 to 52.5. The model is not a general Tajik assistant. It almost never declines when no tool fits (6.9% correct on Tajik, against 31.0% for the base under the lenient parser), it is weak at multi-turn calls, and its calls should be checked before they are executed. We describe the data, the training settings and every evaluation in enough detail to repeat them.
comment: 12 pages, 9 tables, 3 figures. Technical report. Model: https://huggingface.co/Tohirju/Saidzoda-Tajik-LFM-2.6B
☆ BYOD: Build Your Own DLM - Efficient Autoregressive-to-Diffusion Language Model Conversion
Unlike autoregressive (AR) models, diffusion language models (DLMs) permit parallel token updates, flexible generation, and bidirectional attention, but leading systems rely on costly pretraining or full-model fine-tuning. We present Build Your Own DLM (BYOD), a generalizable LoRA-only recipe for parameter-efficient AR-to-DLM conversion. Without architecture-specific tuning, BYOD induces diffusion generation in Gemma 2 9B, Llama 3.1 8B, Qwen2.5 7B, and Ministral 8B; to our knowledge, this is the first reported AR-to-DLM conversion of a Mistral model. The adapters comprise 4.1-5.8% of final parameters while every base-model parameter remains frozen; each 25,000-iteration conversion needs at most 102.4M tokens, processed in 3.1-4.0 hours on one Google Colab GPU. All four models generate from fully masked sequences, use bidirectional context in a controlled attention test, and retain substantial parent-model knowledge. BYOD-Gemma is the strongest BYOD conversion on our nine-task evaluation, reaching 50.6% average accuracy compared with 51.9% for LLaDA 8B Instruct in the same harness. Open-generation quality at low network function evaluation (NFE) budgets remains the principal limitation: BYOD perplexity is 8.3-11.1 versus 4.1 for LLaDA and 2.2-3.0 for the AR parents when generating 128 tokens in 64 steps. To enable further experimentation and inspection, we provide a standalone training and evaluation implementation and interactive demos for all four conversions. BYOD thus provides a practical route for extending diffusion generation to other existing model families while identifying the gap that efficient conversion must next close.
comment: 21 pages, 8 figures. Code: https://github.com/RuurdKuiper/BYOD ; Gemma demo: https://huggingface.co/spaces/Ruurd/byod-gemma-2-9b . Links to all four demos are included in the paper
☆ SCRBench: Beyond Equivalence Checking for Semantic Change Reasoning in Code
Understanding how code changes affect program semantics is a core aspect of code reasoning in language models. It is commonly evaluated by asking whether two programs are semantically equivalent, but a yes/no answer does not reveal whether a model knows which code change caused a semantic difference, or which sequence of code changes produced the modified program. We study two tasks that ask these questions directly, diagnosing semantic change and reconstructing sequences of code changes, alongside detecting semantic equivalence. We build SCRBench, 67,658 Python program pairs generated by applying sequences of code changes that preserve or alter program semantics, and evaluate five language models on a stratified subset of 4,500 pairs. Detecting semantic equivalence exposes weaker models, whose accuracy declines as changes accumulate, but the strongest models remain near the ceiling. Diagnosing semantic change reveals weaknesses that equivalence accuracy hides: a model with 94.71% equivalence accuracy diagnoses only 54.44% of semantic changes. Reconstructing sequences of code changes is much harder: the best model reconstructs the exact sequence for only 39.27% of pairs, and no model exceeds 1.11% when five changes are applied. High equivalence accuracy therefore overestimates how well models reason about the semantic effects of code changes.
comment: 17 pages, including references and appendices
☆ Digital sovereignty in professional translation workflows: a case study of migrating from Windows to Linux
This study examines digital sovereignty in professional translation through a screening of computer-assisted translation tools and translation management systems, and a case study of migrating a translator's workstation from Windows to Linux. The framework combines three principles - Control, Continuity and Exit - with three practical requirements: native Linux operation, independence from mandatory external services, and independent access to essential data and resources. Drawing on documentary evidence and the limited number of responses received from providers, the ecosystem screening distinguishes Linux accessibility from operational independence: browser-based platforms may remain dependent on provider-controlled infrastructure. The migration case demonstrates the feasibility of reconstructing one professional workflow around a locally operable Linux core, using LoopCAT, LibreOffice and locally run TranslateGemma, alongside tools for optical character recognition, communication, credential management and backup. Selected cloud services remained available where needed. The findings suggest that digital sovereignty depends on how workflow dependencies are organized, rather than on individual applications or operating systems. It does not require technological isolation, but meaningful control over essential components, continuity of work and practical exit options. The framework is tailored to the case examined here and may require adaptation to other professional workflows.
comment: 14 pages, submitted for formal peer review at the 47th Translating and the Computer conference (Luxembourg) 8/10 December 2026
☆ CEFR Level Assessment across Languages and Text Granularities
Automatic assessment of textual CEFR levels is an important task in educational natural language processing. However, accurate CEFR level prediction remains challenging due to the naturally imbalanced distribution of CEFR levels and the ambiguous boundaries between adjacent levels. To address these challenges, we propose a unified training objective that combines focal loss with supervised contrastive learning. Focal loss mitigates class imbalance by emphasizing underrepresented and difficult examples, while supervised contrastive learning learns more discriminative representations by encouraging intra-class compactness and inter-class separation. We evaluate the proposed method on sentence- and document-level CEFR assessment in both monolingual and multilingual settings. Experimental results demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms strong baselines across all settings, establishing new state-of-the-art performance on multiple CEFR assessment benchmarks.
comment: 8 pages, 2 figures, 5 tables
☆ Enhancing Knowledge Entity Relation Extraction in Abstracts and Full-text Content of Academic Articles Using Large Language Models
This study investigates the effectiveness of large pre-trained language models (LLMs) for knowledge entity relation extraction (KERE) from academic papers. Existing studies have examined individual types of LLM-based strategies and evaluated model performance using metrics such as precision and recall. To provide a broader evaluation, this study investigates multiple strategies, including closed-source LLM-based CoT prompting, LoRA-adapted open-source LLMs, LLM-enhanced small pre-trained language models (SLMs), and SLM-enhanced closed-source LLMs. In addition, this study introduces two strategies, namely SLM-enhanced open-source LLMs and closed-source LLM-enhanced open-source LLMs. These strategies are evaluated from multiple perspectives, including metrics, their ability to mitigate errors observed in SLMs, and potential directions for model optimization. This study manually constructs two annotated datasets in the NLP domain, covering Abstract and Full-Text datasets. Experimental results show that the LoRA-adapted T5 model achieves the highest macro F1 scores of 0.7408 and 0.7013 on the Abstract and Full-Text datasets, respectively. SLMs also benefit from LLM-generated entity descriptions under the LLM-enhanced SLM strategy. Error analysis further reveals that the effectiveness of LLM-based strategies in mitigating SLM errors varies across error types. Based on the identified limitations and error patterns of these strategies, several optimization directions are proposed. In addition, combining strategies with different error patterns further improves KERE performance.
☆ DAPS: Dependency-Aware Premise Selection for LLM Theorem Proving
LLM-based theorem proving in Lean 4 has advanced rapidly, but provers are difficult to leverage newly contributed lemmas, because retrieval skews toward popular foundational lemmas, leaving the right premises buried among hundreds of thousands of candidates. Existing neural selectors rank candidates by semantic similarity, with three intrinsic limitations: frequency-skewed retrieval, isolated pairwise ranking, and degradation on out-of-distribution queries such as competition problems and informal language. Given that mathematics is structured by dependencies rather than similarities, we restore this signal to both the training data and the model. We curate two underused dependency resources. We conduct the first systematic mining of 53 Lean Blueprint projects, a previously untapped corpus of 3,805 manually curated informal+formal nodes that capture rare, research-level premises absent from Mathlib4. We further pair it with the extraction of comprehensive, typed, multi-level Mathlib4 dependencies. We then introduce DAPS, a dependency-aware premise selector with a structural neighborhood encoder, a group-level contrastive objective, and a Mathlib-then-Blueprint adaptation procedure. DAPS reaches mean Recall@32 of 89.25 on Mathlib4-Heldout (+11.41 over the strong selector LeanHammer), and maintains this lead on two out-of-distribution benchmarks. Further experiments demonstrate that DAPS premises improve theorem proving on miniF2F and IMO-ProofBench. Project page: https://daps-eth.github.io/.
☆ Enhancing Sentiment Classification on Small Datasets through Data Augmentation and Transfer Learning
Small-scale sentiment classification often suffers from data scarcity, which limits the generalization ability of the models. This study evaluates and compares the effectiveness of three data augmentation strategies: Easy Data Augmentation (EDA), back-translation, and contextual token substitution (nlpaug-style), with both traditional machine learning classifiers (Logistic Regression, Random Forest) and transformer-based models (BERT). We perform a comprehensive empirical comparison with low-resource sentiment datasets by summarizing the results of recent studies and performing targeted head-to-head experiments. Our findings indicate that all augmentation methods improve performance. Contextual augmentation yields the most consistent gains for BERT models, while EDA and back-translation provide greater benefits for traditional classifiers. These insights help guide the selection of data augmentation techniques tailored to model type and dataset size, filling a critical gap in research on data augmentation for sentiment classification on small datasets.
☆ Sparse Text Diffusion under Dual Budgets: Context Connectivity and Expert Activation
Long-context diffusion repeatedly pays for both token interaction and feed-forward computation. We formulate these costs as two separate budgets: the edges available to an attention graph and the experts activated for each token. This view connects local, dilated, and global attention with conditional expert computation without assuming that sparsity alone preserves document-level information. We specify normalized masked attention, distinguish denoising depth from sampling iterations, and derive graph and compute bounds. A reported sparse-expert configuration, denoted DualBudget, is analyzed across scientific summarization, multi-hop question answering, dialogue, and sentence-pair prediction. All supplied table measurements are retained. The length study shows gains over the listed baselines through 16K, together with measurable degradation as length increases. Ablations reveal mixed changes across the three reported scores, while the cost record indicates a 20% reduction relative to DiffuSeq under an unspecified timing convention. The analysis separates these observations from unmeasured claims about training speed, absorbing states, global coherence, and deployment memory.
☆ KEEPER: Learning Control-Sufficient Textual Memory for Long-Horizon LLM Agents
Recursive textual memory can carry earlier errors into later updates, yet task performance alone does not establish memory reliability. We define self-consistency bias as the persistence of incorrect claims already present in the incoming memory. We present KEEPER, a comparative analysis of four auxiliary objectives along information-content and update-sensitivity axes within a shared recursive interface, examining how supervision targets relate to agent performance. Among evaluated conditions, reward-related prediction achieve the highest task performance before and after offline reinforcement learning, outperforming joint supervision. A claim-level analysis of one baseline trajectory documents error persistence despite corrective observations. Together, these analyses motivate evaluating error persistence and valid-information retention alongside task outcomes.
☆ KV-Cache Patching: Tracing How and Where Fine-Tuned Behaviors Arise NeurIPS 2026
Fine-tuning a language model changes how it responds, but where is this fine-tuned behavior instantiated? To better understand this, we evaluate whether the change in model behavior arises only during the generation of the answer tokens where the change manifests, or whether altered processing of previous tokens causes it via the attention mechanism. For this, we patch the KV cache from a LoRA fine-tuned model into the unmodified base model, and vice versa. Our results show that for some behaviors, like responding in German or emergent misalignment, patching the KV cache can indeed transfer them from the fine-tuned to the base model. Correspondingly, patching the KV cache from base to fine-tune can partially or fully remove fine-tuned behavior. Furthermore, we find that the effect of patching grows with how much of the KV cache is patched and concentrates at a few pivotal positions, with system-prompt and chat-template tokens having disproportionate influence.
comment: Interpretability as a Science Workshop at NeurIPS 2026. Project page: https://jonasloos.github.io/kv-patching
☆ A prospective randomized study of patient-centered AI for clinical visit preparation
Xincheng Tan, Matthew Thompson, Xiang Ji, Angelica Willis, Will Vaughan, Roma Ruparel, Michael A. Sanchez, Sean Chang, Joseph Xu, Bhavna Daryani, Preeti Singh, Pinal Bavishi, Kejia Chen, Fan Zhang, Priya Gupta, Ernest Lim, Christina Chen, Bob Lou, Dimitrios Antos, Zach Wasson, Ray Luo, Fadi Yousif, Florence Thng, Mark Malhotra, Joseph Breda, Daniel McDuff, Kavi Goel, Katherine Chou, Dale R. Webster, Avinatan Hassidim, Yossi Matias, Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen, Yun Liu, Mike Schaekermann, Quang Duong, Jackie M. Barr
Patients often arrive at brief, time-constrained clinical visits unsure of what to expect or ask, and millions of adults now turn to general-purpose AI chatbots to prepare beforehand. Yet whether conversational AI improves visit readiness remains unclear. We designed a large language model (LLM)-based visit preparation agent to guide patients before an appointment by gathering clinical context, setting visit expectations, providing relevant health information, building a prioritized list of questions for their clinician, and generating a summary. In a prospective consented randomized study in the Google Health app, 802 U.S. adults held 866 health-related conversations with the visit preparation agent (standard or concise variant) or a minimally prompted control chatbot built on the same LLM. The visit preparation agent significantly outperformed the control across blinded clinician evaluations and patient self-reports. In clinician reviews of completed sessions (n = 272), the agent achieved a 16.6% higher rate of comprehensive preparation (67.2% vs. 50.6%; P < 0.05) and an 8.5% higher rate of alignment with patients' health context (98.9% vs. 90.4%; P < 0.01), while maintaining high medical safety and appropriateness across all study arms. Patient post-surveys (n = 460) showed 16.8% higher visit preparedness (73.8% vs. 57.0%; P < 0.01), 14.3% higher confidence in knowing what to ask (81.4% vs. 67.1%; P < 0.01), and 12.0% higher overall satisfaction (74.0% vs. 62.0%; P < 0.05). Clinician and participant metrics were not significantly correlated, indicating that expert review and patient self-assessment capture complementary dimensions of patient-facing AI. These findings suggest that LLM chatbots can safely help patients prepare for clinical visits, with greater benefit when following a structured workflow, and motivate future studies on in-visit communication and clinical outcomes.
comment: 50 pages (16 main text, 34 appendix), 6 figures
☆ BlindToChange: AI Agents Can Find Changes When Asked But Do They Look When Needed?
Given that AI agents can search the web broadly and deeply in real time, it is tempting to conclude that their outputs account for recent world events. We show that this conclusion does not hold in practice. While agents can search and easily find recent changes, the correctness of their responses depends on whether they search and what they search for. Popular agentic search benchmarks like BrowseComp cannot expose failures wherein agents do not recognize their own assumptions that should be verified, since these benchmarks explicitly state what needs to be found. In contrast, many user requests state only the final information need (e.g., an itinerary for a trip), leaving the agent to discover relevant changes (e.g., the temporary closure of a museum) and account for their consequences. To highlight such gaps, we introduce BlindToChange, a benchmark that measures whether agents proactively discover recent events that affect their responses. Our benchmark comprises requests for recommendations where an obvious candidate is no longer applicable due to a recent real-world event. These events are drawn automatically from Wikidata, allowing BlindToChange to be periodically refreshed. Strikingly, we find a big gap -- as high as 27.5 points, even at high reasoning effort -- in systems' performance, when the recent event is not explicitly mentioned compared to when we ask about it directly. Analyzing search trajectories, we learn that more than half of the failures can be attributed to the fact that agents do not directly search to verify whether a relevant fact has changed. Our benchmark highlights, and tracks, a new axis of progress, wherein systems account for recent information that is not explicitly mentioned in the user request.
comment: Preprint
☆ Hybrid Computer Use: A Unified Programmatic, Semantic, and Visual Interface for General Agents
Computer-use agents increasingly tackle tasks ranging from everyday desktop activities to long-horizon professional workflows. Yet interfaces centered on screenshots and mouse-and-keyboard actions can impose a human-interaction prior, requiring repeated screen interpretation while leaving the computer's semantic and programmatic capabilities underexposed. We argue for exposing these capabilities and letting models choose and combine them. We introduce Hybrid Computer Use (HCU), a unified interface for general agents that combines three complementary channels: programmatic interaction through code and command-line tools, semantic interaction through accessibility (AX), and visual interaction through graphical user interfaces (GUI). Our HCU supports efficient AX interaction and guards against stale-state actions during channel switching. A supplementary HCU skill guides agents in selecting and coordinating channels to use the unified interface effectively. Our designed AX tools return compact observations, execute actions in batches, and report their effects as AX diffs, so the model needs fewer round trips. On OSWorld 2.0, HCU achieves the highest Partial and Binary scores among the compared systems. Analyzing agent trajectories, we find that all evaluated models improve with HCU yet allocate work across the channels differently and consistently outperform compared baselines in terms of both efficiency and task success, highlighting the value of unified computer-use interfaces that allow flexible channel selection and combination.
☆ SparseGDN: Chunk Sparse in Linear Attention
Gated Delta Networks (GDNs) offer linear-time sequence modeling, yet long-context prefill remains costly due to dense intra-chunk computation, recurrent-state updates, and intermediate state storage. We introduce SparseGDN, a hardware-aware framework that combines structured intra-chunk approximation with input-dependent recurrent-event selection while producing outputs for every token. A block-adjacent solver reduces local Delta-solve computation, while a dynamic selector allocates recurrent-update budgets across head pairs. The GPU implementation materializes updates only for selected events and reconstructs token outputs using compact state snapshots and group-local interactions, reducing computation and memory traffic. We evaluate SparseGDN on Qwen3.5-4B and Qwen3.5-9B across RULER tasks and context lengths from 4K to 128K. Retaining approximately 29% of recurrent events on average, SparseGDN achieves 1.50-1.94x GDN-core prefill speedups over native FLA kernels, including online selection overhead.
☆ ProSearch: Benchmarking Multi-Constraint Protocol Retrieval in Experimental Science NeurIPS 2026
In AI for Science scenarios, experimental design and method reproduction require retrieving protocols that satisfy multiple interdependent constraints, yet existing benchmarks lack systematic evaluation of this capability. To address this gap, we introduce ProSearch, a benchmark for multi-constraint protocol retrieval in experimental science. ProSearch has three key features: (1) realism, with queries grounded in real experimental records and expert-defined templates; (2) complexity, with 60 experimental fields and their dependencies; and (3) diagnosticity, with 3-5 explicit constraints per query, including numerical and negation constraints. We construct ProSearch through LLM-based extraction, data-driven constraint selection, controlled query generation, and evidence-based relevance validation. The resulting benchmark contains 1,515 queries across six experimental science domains. We conduct extensive experiments on ProSearch with 19 representative retrievers and complementary analyses. The best-performing retriever achieves an average nDCG@10 of only 0.290, which improves to 0.474 with reranking. Structured diagnostic analysis shows that explicit constraint matching provides a strong ranking signal, while manual error analysis identifies joint constraint binding as a key bottleneck. ProSearch provides a testbed for systematically evaluating scientific retrieval systems.
comment: Accepted to NeurIPS 2026 (Evaluations and Datasets Track). 48 pages, 4 figures. Wenliang Liang and Zhiyuan Ning contributed equally. Code: https://github.com/kg4sci/ProSearch. Data: https://huggingface.co/datasets/kg4sci/ProSearch
☆ Comparative Evaluation of LLM-Based Review Paradigms for Academic Paper Quality Assessment EACL 2027
Growing submission volumes have renewed interest in using large language models (LLMs) to support peer review. It remains unclear how such evaluation should be structured, how much the model matters, and whether LLM scores predict research impact. We evaluate five paradigms across three input representations and three LLMs on 232 stratified ICLR 2025 submissions. Direct absolute rating matches comparative ranking on rank correlation with human scores, yet compresses most predictions above the accept threshold, flagging almost none of the papers reviewers scored below it. A base-rate-matched recalibration control locates the cause: comparative ranking supplies placement, not better ordering, and after recalibration Direct Rating reaches higher agreement than Elo while making 24% as many API calls. Abstract-only input beats full-paper summarization, and model choice matters as much as paradigm choice. Replicating on all 11,513 scored submissions reproduces these patterns, shows absolute agreement depends on the evaluated set's score spread, and finds none beating an always-reject baseline in accuracy. Human scores track citations better than any paradigm, with one exception: Group Rating retains its citation correlation after controlling for human scores, and alone ranks within the accepted pool. Ranking quality alone cannot assess review quality; calibration, thresholds, model, and target outcome all matter.
comment: commit to EACL 2027
☆ What We Keep of What We Forget: Replacement Operators and Routing Semantics in Training-Free MoE Expert Pruning
Training-free expert pruning makes two decisions: which experts to remove, and what the layer computes when its router still selects a removed expert. Published methods change both at once. Holding the mask fixed, we compare replacement operators from three families on OLMoE, DeepSeek-V2-Lite and Moonlight, with Granite as a fourth router, using paired, multiplicity-corrected tests. The largest effect is a choice usually left implicit: the survivors' gate scale. On routers trained without top-k renormalization, renormalizing the survivors' gates, a common implementation choice, costs 0.8-8.5 points and reverses whether rerouting beats MoNE's mean-output replacement; on two routers trained with renormalization, the trained scale wins at 50% pruning. We introduce the tilted novice, a closed-form low-rank map of the pruned expert's input whose rank-0 case is MoNE's constant. At 50% pruning it adds 1.2-1.8% parameters and gains 3.45 and 1.37 points over the constant on OLMoE and Moonlight, stable across calibration draws and largely unchanged by 4- and 3-bit quantization. No operator dominates: trained-scale rerouting is best on DeepSeek-V2-Lite, and a partial copy of each pruned expert is statistically indistinguishable from the tilted novice on two models. Evaluation can change conclusions: at 25% pruning MoNE's constant keeps 92-97% of dense multiple-choice accuracy but only 5-65% of GSM8K and 0-17% of code scores, and the calibration domain moves the mask 4-9 times more than resampling. We propose a five-item reporting checklist.
comment: 56 pages, 8 figures, 76 tables
☆ SERIAL-7: Deriving, Realizing, and Preserving Machine-Verifiable Outputs Across Representations NeurIPS 2026
Large language models increasingly generate structured outputs consumed by programs and downstream systems, where semantic correctness alone does not guarantee reliable execution. We introduce SERIAL-7, a Korean-English benchmark built around an executable verification framework for machine-verifiable generation across seven representations. Using 177 validated canonical artifacts, SERIAL-7 separates semantic derivation (Derive), constrained artifact generation (Realize), and cross-representation preservation (Preserve). Its 43 atomic representation constraints are paired with executable checks over format, structure, and task-specific semantics, enabling progressively stricter verification from representation compliance to full artifact validity. Across ten models, REALIZE-L3 HSR ranges from 42.0% to 93.9%, while Full Compliance exposes additional artifact-level failures beyond correct final answers and valid representations. These results show that reliable structured generation requires explicit, executable verification of how artifacts are realized and preserved across representations.
comment: NeurIPS 2026 Workshop on AI for Verifiable Coding
☆ From Transcription to Reformulation: Defining and Benchmarking Grounded Generative Speech Recognition
Qing Wang, Qihan Hu, Hang Lv, Yan Yang, Boqing Liu, Xuechao Zhu, Zehan Li, Hongjie Chen, Jian Kang, Jie Li, Yongxiang Li, Lei Xie
Speech language models have expanded automatic speech recognition (ASR) from transcription to general speech-to-text generation. Yet existing benchmarks still assume a single ground-truth transcript per utterance, an assumption that struggles when models produce readable, formatted, or structured outputs. In this work, we introduce Grounded Generative Speech Recognition (GSR), reformulating speech recognition as generating semantically grounded text instead of a single transcript. We define a grounded reformulation space that characterizes all valid textual realizations supported by the input speech, and establish a four-level hierarchy of reformulation capabilities, including literal transcription, canonical reformulation, semantic reformulation and speech-grounded structuring. Based on this formulation, we present GSR-Bench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate generative speech recognition systems beyond exact transcript matching. GSR-Bench covers diverse scenarios including refined meeting transcription, cross-dialect translation, context-aware speech understanding, and robustness under silent or noisy acoustic conditions. To address the limitations of word-level evaluation metrics, we develop a multi-dimensional evaluation framework combining speech grounding assessment and LLM-based semantic judgment, whose reliability is validated through human preference studies. Extensive experiments across representative architectures, ranging from conventional ASR systems to end-to-end Speech-LLMs, reveal fundamental trade-offs between transcription fidelity and generative reformulation ability. Our analysis further identifies critical failure modes, including acoustic hallucination, unsupported generation, and instruction drift, providing insights into the design and evaluation of future grounded generative speech systems.
☆ In-Model Context Compression with Agentic Soft Tokens for Long-Horizon LLM Agents
Long-horizon LLM agents play an important role in solving complex and sustained tasks, with ever-growing interaction contexts. However, these accumulated contexts will raise substantial computational cost and obscure key decision-relevant evidence. Existing methods typically train external compressors or context-management agents to rewrite context as shorter hard-token sequences, but such external selection may not align with the LLM's evolving representation and is necessarily lossy. In this paper, we introduce Agentic Soft-Token Compression (ASTC), a training-free compression method using soft tokens within LLM agent for long-horizon tasks. Specifically, ASTC uses the model's native recurrent dynamics to determine the already absorbed information, leveraging the commonly-used hybrid Gated Delta Network (GDN)-attention. It then carries this information forward as agentic soft tokens while retaining exact values as hard tokens. The resulting compact sequence reduces later-layer computation and yields reusable KV caches, extending the savings across the agent's trajectory. Extensive experiments on long-horizon tasks show that ASTC matches or exceeds the uncompressed agent's accuracy with up to 50.68% fewer end-to-end Attention Pairs, while trained compressors require 15.4 to 103.7 times more Attention Pairs per successful task. These findings highlight agentic soft tokens as a model-native way to carry absorbed context forward as the task representation evolves.
comment: 26 pages, 9 figures, 11 tables. Code: https://github.com/RISE-X-Lab/Agentic-Soft-Token
☆ PsyInterviewee: Informational Invariance and Relational Adaptivity in Mental Health Interview Simulation
LLM-based simulated interviewees support interviewer training and the evaluation of mental health interviewing systems. Existing studies have primarily focused on improving human-likeness through richer patient profiles and behavioral modeling. However, human-likeness alone does not establish their reliability. Reliable simulation requires preserving profile-grounded clinical facts (informational invariance) while adapting disclosure and interaction behavior to the interview (relational adaptivity). To this end, we introduce PsyInterviewee, which separates a protected truth channel from a dynamic interaction channel and verifies generated clinical claims against the profile. Specifically, asymmetric write permissions allow dialogue context to update disclosure and behavioral states without authorizing new clinical facts; these states guide what profile-supported information is revealed and how it is expressed. In an automated evaluation of interactions between LLM-based interviewers and interviewees, PsyInterviewee achieves higher scores than four representative baselines on most metrics across both axes, as assessed by two LLM judges. Ablations suggest that the two channels contribute to clinical grounding and response modulation, respectively.
comment: 38 pages, including appendices. Code: https://github.com/BeIn-Lab/pdm-interviewer
☆ SciGraphSelect: Auditable Scientific Data Selection through Knowledge--Reasoning Graphs NeurIPS 2026
Scientific data selection is typically driven by relevance or utility scores, providing limited insight into why a document is retained. We introduce SciGraphSelect, a reference-grounded framework for auditable scientific data selection. SciGraphSelect organizes domain-specific knowledge, reusable reasoning operations, and reference-attested relations into a typed knowledge--reasoning graph, then scores candidate documents using concept coverage, relation and path co-support, and directional alignment. To avoid over-interpreting document embeddings, rich relational structure is preserved on the reference side while candidate-side evidence is treated conservatively without assuming relation entailment. By exposing the reference-grounded evidence behind each selection, SciGraphSelect brings traceability to the upstream construction of scientific training corpora and complements downstream scientific verification.
comment: 40th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2026). Workshop: AI4Science
☆ TRIDENT and SHAKTI: A Framework and Benchmark for Hindi AI-Text Detection
As Large Language Models (LLMs) become increasingly multilingual, distinguishing human-written from AI-generated text is essential for maintaining information integrity. However, research remains English-centric, with limited benchmarks for low-resource languages such as Hindi. To address this gap, we introduce SHAKTI, a large-scale Hindi benchmark covering four genres, eight LLM families, multiple prompting strategies, and adversarial transformations. We evaluate its quality through human annotation and analyze linguistic, grammatical, and sentiment-based differences between human- and AI-generated texts. Building on these findings, we propose TRIDENT, a round-trip translation-based detection framework with three variants: TRIDENT-S (static threshold), TRIDENT-D (dynamic threshold), and TRIDENT-C (logistic regression using multi-distance RTT features). TRIDENT leverages semantic consistency between original and round-trip translated texts to identify AI-generated content. Extensive experiments show that TRIDENT outperforms conventional and supervised baselines, with TRIDENT-S achieving the best overall performance. Further evaluations across seven languages, adversarial settings, and unseen LLMs demonstrate its multilingual applicability and robustness, while highlighting sensitivity to the translation model.
☆ Beyond Response Scoring: An AI-aware Cognitive Supervision Framework for Automated Mathematical Short Answer Grading
Transformer-based language models have achieved remarkable success in automated short answer grading (ASAG). However, current methods in ASAG struggle to comprehend, reason about and evaluate complex mathematical answers involving symbols and formulas. These score-only methods fail to generalize across diverse responses and skill states associated with identical scores. Moreover, they ignore the potential upward bias introduced by generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) usage in assessing students' performance and knowledge mastery. To address these limitations, we propose AICG (AI-aware Cognitive-supervised Grading), a two-branch multi-task framework. The first branch combines RoBERTa-based regression, ordinal, and classification heads for individual-answer grading. The second branch uses an expert-designed Q-matrix to associate responses with assessed skills and jointly predicts G-DINA-derived skill mastery and learning gain. Through the shared encoder, these skill-level targets provide cognitive supervision for answer grading beyond score labels. AICG further uses a Gen-AI detector, trained through supervised contrastive pretraining followed by linear classification, to estimate assistance probabilities and convert them into reliability weights, attenuating unreliable cognitive evidence during learning assessment. We conduct experiments on 49,402 instructor-graded responses spanning 19 academic semesters. Relative to RoBERTa regression, AICG reduces mean absolute error (MAE) by 50.3% and improves quadratic weighted kappa (QWK) from 0.798 to 0.927. Ablations identify Q-matrix-guided cognitive supervision as the primary source of improvement, while AI-aware weighting further reduces overall MAE by 4.2% over the unweighted cognitive model and consistently improves MAE and QWK across the four most recent post-Gen-AI semesters.
comment: 12 pages, including references and appendix
☆ TraceSpec: Understanding and Improving Speculative Decoding for LLM Agents
LLM agents execute tasks through repeated model calls over evolving histories of reasoning, actions, and tool feedback. Aggregate speculative-decoding metrics merge these distinct decisions, providing limited guidance on where draft supervision is needed. We present TraceSpec, a framework connecting trajectory evaluation with adaptive draft training. It combines dynamic execution with fixed-prefix replay and introduces TraceSpec-Traj, a corpus of 10,000 training states and 2,500 test states spanning browsing and software engineering. Analysis of five speculative baselines reveals that aggregate acceptance can rise with context length while declining within matched late browsing actions. Workload and phase further distinguish these trends, motivating supervision guided by trajectory conditions. TraceSpec trains on intermediate assistant turns and allocates a fixed prediction budget using state-conditioned estimates of prefix-aware acceptance gaps. Across three target sizes and two temperatures, it improves replay throughput by 12.5% to 22.6% over its DSpark base. Qwen3-4B ablations show that adaptive allocation increases accepted length by 3.3% to 10.0% over fixed full-turn supervision, with additional comparisons substantiating the roles of state conditioning and consecutive-token agreement. The resulting evaluation resources, trajectory findings, and training strategy connect the analysis of agent execution to practical draft improvement.
☆ S2TDR: Structured Multimodal Reconstruction for Sticker-Aware Dialogue Understanding
Stickers are widely used in social media dialogues to express affect, stance, and intent beyond literal text. Their meanings are often non-literal and context-dependent, making them difficult to handle with generic visual fusion or standalone captioning. We propose Sticker-to-Text Dialogue Reconstruction (S2TDR), a structured multimodal reconstruction framework that converts sticker turns into contextually appropriate textual utterances. S2TDR decomposes sticker interpretation into visual cue extraction, affective-intent inference, and context-aware dialogue reconstruction, using OCR text only as an auxiliary cue when available. The reconstructed dialogue can then be consumed by existing text-based dialogue models. Experiments on sentiment analysis, intent recognition, and dialogue summarization show that S2TDR generally improves multiple downstream models over direct sticker integration methods. Further analyses on component ablations, OCR-empty stickers, and reconstruction quality indicate that structured reconstruction provides an interpretable and effective way to integrate sticker semantics into dialogue understanding.
comment: 12 pages, 4 figures, 5 tables
☆ Context as Infrastructure: Knowledge Compilation for Retrieval in Agentic Systems with Harnesses
Zhichang Yu, Baining Cao, Sbaaoui Idriss, Qi Wang, Gangqiang Xu, Ling Qin, Xiaoling Jin, An Liu, Shaohao Cai, Xiaoyang Bao, Shengle Chen, Changchang Ding, Pengfei Zhu, Jingxiang Xu, Yifeng Mao, Lu Liu, Hai Jin, Yingfeng Zhang
Retrieval-augmented generation is becoming agentic. A search harness writes queries, reads results, reformulates, and decides when to stop. This largely solves accuracy: a harness with only BM25/grep and MiniMax M3 answers 85% of BrowseComp-Plus and 91% on multi-hop FRAMES in our runs, without compiled or vector indexes. It exposes a context problem: an undisciplined loop repeats queries, rereads documents, and fills the window with unused passages. The missing layer is knowledge compilation: a configurable ingestion pipeline where LLMs enrich documents with context no chunk contains alone--navigation hierarchies with claim-evidence leaves, entity graphs, timelines, mind maps, ontologies, wikis, and memory. Compilation is not a better retriever: under a competent harness, structural artifacts gave no detectable accuracy gain on FRAMES, and a PageIndex-style outline degraded at scale. It is a supply layer. A navigation tree whose leaves are claim-evidence pairs--the mechanism we measure--cuts query tokens by 91% when evidence suffices and adds 1.9% when it does not, a 38% average reduction; this implies a 2% break-even sufficiency rate and a measured rate near 43%. A decision gate cuts latency from 140 s to 30 s, though substitution's token saving is bought with retrieval rounds and carries its own latency cost. Other artifacts--ontology, graph, wiki, timeline, mind map, memory--pay off in deployment (governance, integration, onboarding, temporal orientation, continuity) where accuracy benchmarks cannot see them. We describe RAGFlow's pipeline and harness (open source at https://github.com/infiniflow/ragflow), which turns the loop into five disciplined stations and keeps the context entering the model the smallest sufficient set; together they form an agent-native database: a store that hands the agent compiled, governed context instead of a ranked list of passages.
comment: 13 pages, 2 figures
☆ Lineage Is Memory: Parent Inheritance and Feedback Disclosure in Short-Budget LLM-Guided Optimization
Iterative language-model optimizers refine prompts and programs by evaluating a candidate, showing a proposer model a sample of failing cases, and keeping revisions that improve performance. Recent work attributes the limits of this loop to narrow single-round reflection, introducing full-set error clustering, targeted minibatches, or larger proposer models so the optimizer sees more failure modes per step. Yet every existing evaluation tests these mechanisms exclusively inside lineage-preserving search, where each revision edits a surviving parent, leaving the contribution of parent inheritance confounded with the breadth of per-round feedback. Across 1,750 pre-registered runs spanning nine prompt and program synthesis benchmarks, we separate parent inheritance from feedback disclosure under matched evaluation budgets. We find that greedy parent inheritance drives the vast majority of optimization progress, outperforming seed-reset resampling even when seed-reset proposals receive a clustered summary of all failures in every round or use a larger proposer model. While full-set error clustering and diverse failure selection improve single-step rewrites from the seed and accelerate the opening rounds of search, sequential parent inheritance rapidly closes this gap as solved error modes are retained in the candidate and filtered from subsequent failure lists. Moreover, decomposing token expenditure in GEPA reveals that proposer reflection accounts for only a small fraction of total cost whereas validation and minibatch gating consume nearly the entire budget, showing that greedy parent inheritance over raw failures captures the gains of complex reflective loops at a fraction of their compute.
comment: 17 pages, 2 figures, 10 tables. Code, pre-registrations, and 1,750 run logs at https://github.com/shangliy/lineage-is-memory
☆ HyperRepair: Recovering Forgotten General Capabilities of Fine-Tuned Language Models
Fine-tuning improves a language model's performance in a target domain but can weaken its general capabilities. Existing methods often face a trade-off between general capabilities and domain specialization, making it difficult to preserve both. We introduce HyperRepair, a framework for recovering general capabilities while retaining domain specialization at only inference cost. To make recovery generalizable across models sharing a pretrained backbone, HyperRepair learns a hypernetwork from repairs trained on source models. The hypernetwork uses activation fingerprints that summarize changes from the pretrained backbone to generate a tailored Repairing Side Net (RSN), whose prompt-conditioned gate applies corrections selectively. This enables recovery on models from unseen adaptation domains without target-domain examples or additional optimization. We evaluate HyperRpair across two model families, 12 LoRA adaptation datasets, and 15 general benchmarks. On the default split, HyperRepair achieves 93.4% of the base models' average general score while retaining 99.5% of the fine-tuned models' average domain score.
comment: 29 pages, 5 figures
☆ Language Models Show a "Women-Are-Wonderful" Effect in Blame Attribution That is Not Just Leniency
This paper investigates the Women-Are-Wonderful (WaW) effect in language-model blame attribution: a favorable bias in which women receive more positive evaluations than men. Using 11,270 interpersonal conflicts from r/AmItheAsshole, we construct matched counterfactuals that vary the gender of the person being judged (the original poster) and the person affected (the counter-party). Across four language models, gender changes a minority of verdicts, but those changes consistently favor women. The effect is strongly role-dependent. Making the original poster a woman reduces the odds of blame by 9--52%, while making the counter-party a woman multiplies them by 2.7--9.2X. Counter-party WaW also varies across conflict types, strengthening in communication and relationship conflicts and weakening in family conflicts. Exploratory probes suggest that counter-party gender can shift judgments of sympathy, reasonableness, harm and protection. WaW is therefore not just leniency toward women being judged: models also judge conduct more harshly when it affects a woman.
☆ MUON-RT Reusing the Teacher's Trajectory for Momentum-Free Muon for LLM Self-Distillation
Self-distillation methods for large language models with an exponential moving average (EMA) teacher already retain a history of student updates. Muon nevertheless stores a separate momentum buffer, increasing persistent training memory. We propose Muon with Reused Teacher (Muon-RT), which reuses the teacher-student displacement to eliminate momentum buffers for hidden weight matrices. We show that this displacement encodes an exponentially weighted history of applied updates and smooths temporally uncorrelated noise under a local model. Muon-RT removes its radial component, normalizes it spectrally, and mixes it with the current gradient after Newton-Schulz (NS) orthogonalization. Under explicit regularity and alignment assumptions, we establish linear contraction of an expected objective-gap bound toward a residual error level. With Self-Distillation Fine-Tuning (SDFT) on Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Muon-RT improves average accuracy over AdamW by 2.6 points with 42% less persistent memory, and over momentum Muon by 5.4 points with 27% less persistent memory. With Self-Distillation Policy Optimization (SDPO) on Olmo-3-7B-Instruct, it improves average accuracy over AdamW by 2.0 points.
comment: Under Submission
♻ ☆ Tracing the Influence of Retrieved Literature on Scientific Ideation in LLMs
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate research ideas from scientific literature. Existing systems combine literature retrieval with search, generation, and refinement, making it difficult to determine how the retrieval strategy itself shapes the ideas generated. We isolate this contribution by comparing five retrieval strategies and a No Literature baseline under a shared generation protocol, using 45,000 ideas across 15 machine learning topics and ten open-weight models. Relative to no literature basline, all five retrieval strategies reduce diversity among ideas generated from the same set of papers by $5.6\%$--$17.9\%$, while most increase diversity by $10.2\%$--$18.1\%$ when ideas from different sets are pooled. Effects on idea quality and novelty are modest on average but vary across topics. We further apply a JSD-based attribution method to trace the influence of individual input papers on each idea's motivation, core idea, approach, and validation. In $79.3\%$ of ideas, only one or two distinct papers receive the highest attribution scores across these four parts. These leading sources often recur across ideas generated from the same set of papers, and groups with more varied source attribution contain more diverse ideas ($r=0.70$). These findings motivate various sets of literature and the use of attribution to guide the choice of sources for subsequent ideas.
comment: Updated preprint. Under review
♻ ☆ Metacognitive Decoding: Efficient Inference for Diffusion Language Agents
Mingyu Zhao, Shuhang Lin, Ligong Han, Xiaojing Yu, Zhenting Wang, Yifei Pang, Yang Zhou, Dimitris N. Metaxas
Diffusion language models offer a promising path to efficient agents through parallel token generation. However, efficient interaction requires adapting both where computation is spent and how much text is generated. We introduce a metacognitive controller that guides diffusion generation according to the needs of the current response and the agent's interaction with the environment. It learns when to finalize tokens and how far generation should extend, reducing overall computation within responses. Our controller, a lightweight plug-in for the diffusion backbone, is trained on agent trajectories to balance correctness and generation cost. This approach connects the agent's generation process to the interaction the agent serves. Experiments across five benchmarks demonstrate that our approach reduces inference FLOPs by 20.6% on average compared with the most efficient baseline, while maintaining competitive task accuracy. Ablation studies further validate the effectiveness of our approach.
comment: 10 pages, 4 figures
♻ ☆ TamilEOT: A Dataset and Model for Semantic End-of-Turn Detection in Tamil Telephone Speech
A voice agent must decide, at each pause, whether the speaker has finished or is still thinking. Without a model of the language, systems fall back to a fixed silence timeout: too short, and the agent interrupts; too long, and every turn pays the full wait. We release TamilEOT, to our knowledge the first open dataset and detector for semantic end-of-turn detection in a South Indian language: 18,485 labelled turn boundaries from 116 real Tamil telephone conversations, two audio-only detectors built on Smart Turn v3's architecture, and a turn-level companion set of 4,774 whole turns with their pause structure. On a held-out split of 4,168 clips from 30 unseen calls, accuracy rises from 70.30% zero-shot to 83.71% (8.7 MB) and 86.13% (21 MB); ROC-AUC rises from 0.751 to 0.921. Both run in under 150 ms single-threaded on a laptop CPU. We also report what building it cost. Our rule-derived negative-class labels scored 44.4% against a blind human pass, below chance, because the rule answered a different question than the model is asked; an audio-LLM labeller at 97.5% agreement replaced them for US$5.69. Of six training levers, only encoder capacity moved the result: three identical runs spanned 0.87 accuracy points, the floor below which nothing else here is a finding. Replaying labelled boundaries through the production VAD and streaming adapter costs a further 2.60 points, and 7.8% of boundaries never reach the model at all. Data, weights, code and every negative result are public.
comment: 14 pages, 7 tables. Code, data and models: https://github.com/santhosh-005/tamil-eot
♻ ☆ Windowed-MTP: Removing the Full-Context Draft-KV Tax at Million-Token Context
Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive generation by having a draft propose tokens that a target verifies in parallel. Frontier models increasingly ship a built-in Multi-Token-Prediction (MTP) draft head, assumed to be cheap beside verification. A shipped full-attention MTP head can become disproportionately expensive beside a hybrid target at long context. The head attends over the full KV cache for each of $γ$ draft forwards per decode step, while only 9-25% of target layers retain full attention, so a single draft layer can issue context reads at a rate comparable to the whole target. On hard, low-acceptance workloads, deep native MTP becomes net-negative: slower than no speculation.
We apply a StreamingLLM-style window plus attention sink to the draft only (Windowed-MTP); target verification remains full-context, so the target distribution is preserved. The intervention is training-free and drop-in. On three models from two hybrid families (Gated DeltaNet and Mamba2) at 1M context on one GPU in SGLang, it provides an acceptance-free 1.28-1.44x per-decode-step speedup over native MTP. The speedup grows with context; at matched acceptance, TPOT improves by the same factor. The window removes most of the draft's working set, and a compact ring buffer converts that reduction into physical capacity: it reclaims the otherwise dead draft pool, a measured 7.7-11.1% of total KV at 1M, making room for one additional concurrent 1M request in the Qwen-35B batch sweep.
comment: 29 pages, 5 figures, 16 tables. v2: Windowed draft attention is merged upstream in SGLang (PR #32673). Code: https://github.com/avalliappan-nvidia/windowed-mtp-b200
♻ ☆ Gluing Local Contexts into Global Meaning: A Sheaf-Theoretic Decomposition of Transformer Representations NeurIPS 2026
Prior research into interpretability does not test whether a representation stays consistent under paraphrasing. Each pair of paraphrases can be thought of as a local witness that two activations should be the same. From these local witnesses we can build a cellular sheaf on the paraphrase graph. The question of what is consistent under paraphrasing can be answered by the Laplacian $L_\mathcal{F}$ given a frozen model. No training required. Our kernel $H^0$ gives us a content subspace. We show that with only 20 dims the kernel outperforms the subspace that LEACE retains with all dims on held-out CounterFact fact retrieval by $+17.1$\,pp on average across 8 models. By constraining all paraphrases of a fact together we see an additional increase of $+6.5$\,pp. Our spectral complement shows us where the causal influence is concentrated. Ablating the coordinates that vary the most when paraphrased (which approximates ablating the spectral complement at the coordinate level) leads to $5.6$ to $26.5\times$ larger changes in model outputs compared to ablating coordinates with matched per-coordinate variability. We find this across 9 models from 124M to 13B params. By stacking layers we can create a grid which has $b_1 = N(L-1)$ algebraic 1-cycles. The harmonic mass derived from the model varies by nearly 3 orders of magnitude between the 6 architectures. It also tracks the order of steering fragility (Spearman's $ρ= 0.90$, exact one-sided permutation $p = 0.014$). The kernel, its spectral complement and the harmonic mass all come from the same paraphrase graph. Project page: https://cwru-aism.github.io/gluing-lc-page/.
comment: NeurIPS 2026 Poster, ICLR Unifying Concept Representation Learning
♻ ☆ Robustness of Chatbot LLM Judgments of Presidential Actions and Hypothetical Reforms
Chatbots are increasingly consulted about public affairs, and their judgments of policies are useful only if they are robust. We measure this robustness in the setting of an ordinary user, through consumer chat interfaces. For 30 days, five chatbot configurations (Mistral, Gemini Flash, Claude Sonnet, and Claude Opus at two effort settings) were asked twice a day to score the long-term effect on the United States of 40 actions of the last four presidential administrations and of 15 hypothetical reforms, each with a confidence and a short comment. The judgments are robust: all configurations agree on the sign and the ranking of the administrations' mean scores, and two different configurations asked on the same day give opposite signs to the same action in about 4% of cases. Responses from different days differ more than same-day responses (which shared the order of the items); the difference grows slowly over the month, except where the service itself changed. We identify three such changes, which shifted the judgments while leaving little or no trace in the interface. Treating the comments as a retrieval task, we find them specific to each item and consistent across runs and chatbots, with lexical and embedding similarities agreeing. We release the dataset of 16,500 judgments.
♻ ☆ DeFT-RAG: Decomposing Multi-Hop Questions into Self-Contained Sub-Questions with Reusable Answers
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) lets a large language model (LLM) answer questions by retrieving relevant passages from a large corpus. However, RAG struggles with multi-hop questions, which require chaining facts spread across several documents through intermediate entities that the question never mentions. Graph-based RAG methods retrieve once from the entities a question names and so rarely recover the full evidence chain. Iterative RAG methods recover it step by step, but their accuracy is limited by the many tasks they ask the LLM to perform, such as planning the sub-questions, deciding their dependencies, rewriting them as answers arrive, and keeping track of what is known. We propose DeFT-RAG, a RAG framework built on three components. First, DeFT-RAG generates one self-contained sub-question at a time from the original question and the sub-questions answered so far with their answers (QA pairs). Each sub-question names every entity it asks about, which removes the need to plan, track dependencies or rewrite, and lets the LLM focus on a single fine-grained task at a time. Second, DeFT-RAG moves the remaining LLM work outside the LLM: rule-based updates to a QA table that keeps track of what is known, and yes/no decisions made by a fine-tuned lightweight decision model. Third, DeFT-RAG caches the QA pairs and reuses an answer when a later question asks a sub-question with the same meaning. On MuSiQue, 2WikiMultiHopQA and HotpotQA, DeFT-RAG achieves the best accuracy among thirteen baselines with both gpt-4o-mini and Qwen3.6 as the backbone, while giving the LLM fewer input tokens than any other iterative method. With a QA cache shared across 1,000 MuSiQue questions, 23.1% of sub-questions are answered from the cache, which reduces LLM calls by 12.9% without lowering accuracy.
comment: 12 pages, 2 figures, 7 tables. Code: https://github.com/Dingyi-Kang/DeFT-RAG
♻ ☆ Thinking Inertia: LLMs Keep Thinking When Told Not To NeurIPS 2026
Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly ship with explicit "thinking modes", yet their counterpart, "no-thinking", has received far less attention. We study LLMs' no-thinking behavior along two axes. a. How to measure no-thinking? Prior work typically defines no-thinking through proxies such as a disabled thinking mode or the absence of long traces. These proxies are unreliable: disabled thinking modes may still emit reasoning, while long traces may contain filler rather than genuine inference. We instead normalize each response into a pre-answer trace and final answer, and evaluate it at three levels: (i) Empty-Thinking Rate for strict answer-only compliance; (ii) instruction-aware Question-Pre-answer Relevance for similarity between the question and pre-answer trace; and (iii) LLM-as-judge Explicit Inference Rate for visible explicit inference. Together, these metrics distinguish answer-only output, relevant but non-inferential text, and explicit inference. b. How does no-thinking vary across tasks and models? We evaluate six prompting interventions on six LLMs across Boolean, multiple-choice, and open-ended questions. We find that explicit no-think controls cannot reliably eliminate visible inference. Models instead exhibit "Thinking Inertia": explicit inference persists even under strict controls and becomes more prevalent as the answer space opens. Accuracy remains stable on Boolean and multiple-choice tasks, whereas open-ended tasks reveal a trade-off between answer-only compliance and task accuracy. Rewriting the same questions across answer spaces shows that supplying candidate answers makes answer-only responses easier to produce. These findings establish no-thinking as a non-trivial capability: stopping explicit reasoning cannot be assumed from model settings or instructions alone and deserves systematic evaluation alongside reasoning ability.
comment: Accepted by NeurIPS 2026. Website: https://thinking-inertia.github.io GitHub: https://github.com/thinking-inertia/code
♻ ☆ Imputation of Public Opinion Data with Large Language Models
Large language models (LLMs) are widely evaluated as simulators of survey responses, yet applied survey research mostly faces item nonresponse. Imputation fills in those missing values to restore the overall structure of a partially observed dataset and has its own well-defined evaluation criteria, which differ fundamentally from prediction accuracy. We present the first evaluation of LLM imputation against proper multiple-imputation metrics and statistical baselines on more than 5 million imputed responses from four public opinion surveys under various missingness mechanisms. We evaluate in-context learning (ICL) for this task by investigating 84 ICL configurations and comparing the best-performing configurations on six open-weight LLMs. The strongest ICL approach improves on zero-shot persona prompting but remains, at best, competitive with statistical baselines (MICE PMM, TabPFN). ICL approaches are sensitive to survey topics and consume 2-3 orders of magnitude more compute. Moreover, prediction metrics commonly used in LLM survey simulation (macro-F1, TVD) do not reliably track imputation quality. Our findings highlight the importance of fit-for-purpose evaluation for LLM imputation, where established multiple imputation remains the better default.
♻ ☆ Exploring the potential and limitations of Model Merging for Multi-Domain Adaptation in ASR INTERSPEECH 2026
Model merging is a scalable alternative to multi-task training that combines the capabilities of multiple specialised models into a single model. This is particularly attractive for large speech foundation models, which are typically adapted through domain-specific fine-tuning, resulting in multiple customised checkpoints, for which repeating full fine-tuning when new data becomes available is computationally prohibitive. In this work, we study model merging for multi-domain ASR and benchmark 11 merging algorithms for 10 European Portuguese domains, evaluating in-domain accuracy, robustness under distribution shift, as well as English and multilingual performance. We further propose BoostedTSV-M, a new merging algorithm based on TSV-M that mitigates rank collapse via singular-value boosting and improves numerical stability. Overall, our approach outperforms full fine-tuning on European Portuguese while preserving out-of-distribution generalisation in a single model.
comment: Accepted at INTERSPEECH 2026
♻ ☆ DialFork: Going Beyond Factuality to Evaluate Procedural Hallucination in Conversational Agents
Sergio Burdisso, Esaú Villatoro-Tello, Dairazalia Sánchez-Cortés, Yanis Labrak, Jordi Luque, Milos Cernak, Petr Motlicek
Large language models (LLMs) deployed as conversational agents are increasingly expected to follow procedural logic. While factual hallucination has received extensive attention, a different failure mode has been overlooked: procedural hallucination, in which an agent produces individually fluent and factually plausible utterances while deviating from the intended conversational process. We introduce DialFork, the first benchmark to measure this failure mode on raw dialogue text. DialFork is built by forking conformant dialogues at controlled turn positions and injecting one of four hallucination types, yielding 36,278 dialogues across 24 tasks in 12 domains; 30 human annotators validate the construction. We define three evaluation tasks that characterize procedural deviation at three granularities: how far a set of dialogues deviates from conformant ones (monitoring deployed agents), how far a single dialogue does (procedural retrieval), and at which turn a dialogue first goes off-track (real-time guardrails). For the first two, we propose dialog-flow-aware metrics, FlowKL and FlowScore, that compare dialogues by how they unfold rather than their content. At the dialogue level, FlowScore significantly outperforms all baselines across seven encoders, showing that semantic similarity is no substitute for procedural similarity. We release DialFork under open licenses at https://github.com/idiap/dialfork, hoping the community will measure conversational process alongside content.
♻ ☆ Beyond Public Access in LLM Pre-Training Data
Using a legally obtained dataset of 34 copyrighted O'Reilly Media books (13,962 paragraphs), we apply the DE-COP membership inference attack to test whether OpenAI models show recognition of non-public (pay-walled) content they were not licensed to train on. Our main contribution is examining non-public books, which allows us to consider potential access violations and not just training inclusion. Our results suggest that GPT-4o, OpenAI's more recent and capable model in our sample, exhibits patterns consistent with recognition of non-public books, with an AUROC score of 0.82 (95% bootstrapped CI: 0.60-0.96) -- where above 50% is better than random chance. GPT-3.5 Turbo (trained two years prior) and the smaller GPT-4o Mini both score near chance recognition on non-public data (0.54 and 0.56, respectively). Results are robust to independent paraphrasers (Gemma and Qwen) and leave-one-book-out sensitivity analyses. We also test both GPT-4o and GPT-4o mini, with the same October 2023 training cutoff date, to ensure the model is not simply identifying language shifts over time. These findings support disclosure requirements for pre-training data provenance and formal licensing markets for training content. Results remain preliminary given the small book sample, possible contamination of post-cutoff controls, and differences across models in size, architecture, and training composition.
comment: 38 pages, 6 figures, 12 tables. Updated to reflect the published version in AI and Ethics
♻ ☆ Optimal Multi-bit Generative Watermarking Schemes Under Worst-Case False-Alarm Constraints
This paper considers the problem of multi-bit generative watermarking for large language models under a worst-case false-alarm constraint. Prior work established a lower bound on the achievable miss-detection probability in the finite-token regime and proposed a scheme claimed to achieve this bound. We show, however, that the proposed scheme is in fact suboptimal. We then develop two new encoding-decoding constructions that attain the previously established lower bound, thereby completely characterizing the optimal multi-bit watermarking performance. Our approach formulates the watermark design problem as a linear program and derives the structural conditions under which optimality can be achieved. In addition, we identify the failure mechanism of the previous construction and compare the tradeoffs between the two proposed schemes.
comment: 42 pages, 8 tables
♻ ☆ Instrument-Anchored LLM Judges Transfer Expert Counseling-Quality Ratings Across Three German Corpora
Automatic assessment of communication quality in counseling conversations is bottlenecked by data: expert-rated corpora are small and expensive to grow. Therefore we study cross-domain prediction of the expert's overall impression across three German simulated-counseling corpora from one university (two general-practice medical, one parent-teacher; $n=195$ sessions). Features are construct scores that four small LLM judges assign from the transcript, drawn from the experts' own rating instruments, plus a compact nonverbal block; all models are open-weight and run locally, preserving data protection. Trained on the other two corpora, this stack predicts the held-out corpus at Spearman $ρ= .533$; in-domain training on the same sessions falls about a fifth short ($.420$; paired gap $+.113$, 95% CI $[+.067, +.157]$), and the gap holds at matched training size and on identical test sessions. The signal lies in what is said: the four judges alone transfer at $.523$, and the nonverbal block adds $+.01$ (CI includes zero). Asking a judge for instrument constructs instead of generic dialogue qualities raises its transfer by about 30% ($.32$ to $.42$); restoring speaker attribution where per-speaker audio was lost is worth $+.08$ to $+.10$ on that fold. Where a program's own ratings are scarce, other programs' data is a viable training set and language carries it.
comment: Preprint. 22 pages, 3 figures
♻ ☆ Language steering in latent space to mitigate unintended code-switching
Multilingual Large Language Models (LLMs) often exhibit hallucinations such as unintended code-switching, reducing reliability in downstream tasks. We propose latent-space language steering, a lightweight inference-time method that identifies a language direction via Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on parallel translations and steers embeddings along this axis to control language identity. Our approach reduces next-token distributional divergence by up to 55\%, Code-Switching Index by 63--99\%, while preserving broad semantic direction with negligible computational overhead and requires only minimal parallel data for calibration.
comment: Published at AINL 2026
♻ ☆ Optimizing Anytime Reasoning via Budget Relative Policy Optimization
Scaling test-time compute is crucial for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Existing approaches typically employ reinforcement learning (RL) to maximize a verifiable reward obtained at the end of reasoning traces. However, such methods optimize only the final performance under a large and fixed token budget, which hinders efficiency in both training and deployment. In this work, we present a novel framework, AnytimeReasoner, to optimize anytime reasoning performance, which aims to improve token efficiency and the flexibility of reasoning under varying token budget constraints. To achieve this, we truncate the complete thinking process to fit within sampled token budgets from a prior distribution, compelling the model to summarize the optimal answer for each truncated thinking for verification. This introduces verifiable dense rewards into the reasoning process, facilitating more effective credit assignment in RL optimization. We then optimize the thinking and summary policies in a decoupled manner to maximize the cumulative reward. Additionally, we introduce a novel variance reduction technique, Budget Relative Policy Optimization (BRPO), to enhance the robustness and efficiency of the learning process when reinforcing the thinking policy. Empirical results in mathematical reasoning tasks demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms GRPO across all thinking budgets under various prior distributions, enhancing both training and token efficiency.
♻ ☆ Adapting LLM-SC to Living Sacred Heritage: Domain-Specific Extraction, Semantic Networks and Human Evaluation on Pashupatinath Temple Reviews
Large language model (LLM) pipelines can turn visitor reviews into structured data, but generic schemes may miss rituals, sacred spaces, cultural restrictions and emotionally mixed experiences at living sacred heritage sites. We adapted the LLM-Social Computing (LLM-SC) framework to Pashupatinath Temple, Nepal, by specifying a 12-type entity taxonomy (four original LLM-SC types plus eight sacred-heritage types), four relation types and nine aspect-sentiment dimensions in a GPT-4o extraction prompt, which was applied to a fixed random sample of 2,500 English-language Tripadvisor reviews from a processed corpus of 3,939. The exports contain 11,286 entity, 6,232 aspect-sentiment and 5,590 relation records, covering 2,485, 2,487 and 2,433 reviews, respectively; the eight added sacred-heritage types account for 64.8% of entity records. Against an adjudicated two-annotator reference for 200 reviews, exact normalized surface-and-type matching gave provisional entity scores of 41.0% precision, 21.8% recall and 28.4% micro-F1. Aspect-presence F1 was 53.6% and end-to-end aspect-plus-polarity F1 was 42.6%. Human adjudication supported 153 of 194 first-listed relation candidates (one per review; 78.9%), a candidate-level rate that does not estimate relation recall or whole-graph precision. The contribution is a culturally grounded, domain-specific adaptation with component-wise human evaluation and explicit reproducibility and generalization limitations.
♻ ☆ CogBattery: Human-Referenced Evaluation of Cognitive Task Behavior and Structure in Language Models
Human cognitive tasks let us compare language models with humans under controlled conditions. Yet a model can reproduce the direction of a human effect while making different errors. CogBattery evaluates 54 open-weight language models on text adaptations of 13 cognitive paradigms, comparing each with human data from its source study. Like humans, models respond more to n-back lures than to controls, yet they make far more false alarms on ordinary non-targets. Most models' reported confidence separates correct from incorrect answers less well than humans' does, and most always choose the same wager, including models that classify accurately. These patterns span many model families. Across tasks, model scores share two dimensions. The first is closely tied to scale, yet larger models are not consistently closer to humans. Predefined cognitive groupings show no reliable predictive advantage over random groupings of the same size. These results show that matching human effect directions does not establish human-like behavior. CogBattery provides condition-level human references for testing errors and confidence reports in new models.
comment: 13 pages, 3 figures, 5 tables. Code at https://github.com/dengzhe-hou/CogBattery. Renamed from CogArena to avoid confusion with an unrelated benchmark of the same name
♻ ☆ When Support Crosses the Line: Evaluating Ethical Boundaries in LLM-Based Mental Health Support in the Chinese Context
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly explored for mental health support, yet existing benchmarks primarily focus on supportive capabilities rather than whether models consistently adhere to professional ethical boundaries. This issue is particularly important in multi-turn interactions, where users may introduce new information or exert emotional pressure over time. We introduce MindEth-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating ethical boundary adherence in multi-turn mental health interactions. Grounded in professional ethical standards for mental health services in China, MindEth-Bench covers multiple dimensions of ethical conduct and uses Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to systematically explore interaction trajectories that stress-test model boundaries. Experiments across nine LLMs show that models that initially respond appropriately can shift toward ethical violations over extended interactions, with substantial variation across models and ethical dimensions. These results show that single-turn evaluations may overestimate the ethical reliability of LLM-based mental health support systems and highlight the need to evaluate ethical behavior throughout multi-turn interaction.
♻ ☆ Keepace.ai: A Technical Report on a Large Language Model for Sports and Health
Keepace. ai Team, :, Bowen Wu, Heng Wang, Jufeng Mi, Kang Liu, Kun Li, Ling Man, Long He, Suli Fan, Xiaosen Jiang, Yi Wang, Ying He, Yu Tang, Yunhan Li, Zifang Liu
Large language models hold promise for delivering safe, scientifically grounded, and personalized exercise guidance at scale, yet the sports-and-health domain still lacks curated training corpora and rigorous evaluation benchmarks. Keepace (Keepace.ai) is a domain-specialized LLM built on Qwen3.5-27B through post-training, currently optimized for Chinese-language exercise guidance across three tasks: workout plan generation, sports-and-health knowledge QA, and personal sports data analysis. In internal rubric-based evaluations designed with domain experts, Keepace outperforms its base model and larger general-purpose baselines, with the most pronounced improvements in exercise safety, boundary compliance, structured output completeness, and scientific accuracy. This report summarizes the current design, data pipeline, safety-first evaluation framework, and evaluation results of Keepace.
comment: 21 pages, 3 figures, 13 tables. Technical report
♻ ☆ Where Is the "Self" of a Large Language Model? -- From Self-Index to Self-Reference
Whether a large language model has a self is usually argued without a way to measure it. We turn the question into the measurement of a functional self with two levels familiar from biology: a self-index, which marks material as the model's own and shapes how it is processed, much as nearly all animals tag self-generated signals with a corollary discharge, and self-reference, the ability to recognize what is one's own, as in mirror self-recognition. Each level has criteria that can be tested in any open-weight model. We place the same text in an Assistant, a User, or a System message of the model's own chat template. In Qwen3.8-27B, the representation singles out the model's own message from both external sources, as predicted in advance for early layers, and does so at every one of its 64 layers and in every held-out text, while User and System stay close to each other; asked who wrote a message, the model claims its own (0.77) and assigns both external sources to the user. In three models and four readouts (Qwen3.8-27B without and with thinking, gpt-oss-20b, and gpt-oss-120b), replacing eight coordinates per layer of the model's own message by those of the same text as a User message removes the claim (to at most 0.05), installing them into a User message creates it, and random subspaces of the same dimension do neither; the coordinates are read mainly at the end of the message, before the last third of the layers, and editing them leaves answers about the content of the message and an unrelated multiplication unchanged. Across eighteen open-weight models from nine developers, the two levels are nested: no model recognizes its own messages without a self-index, and neither level follows model size or published benchmark scores. Together, these results support the account that self-reference is a readout of a self-index.
comment: 61 pages, 14 figures, 21 tables
♻ ☆ VerifyMAS: Hypothesis Verification for Failure Attribution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems NeurIPS2026
Large language model-driven multi-agent systems (LLM-MAS) excel at complex tasks, yet unreliable agents remain a key bottleneck to system-level reliability. Automatic failure attribution is therefore critical, but existing approaches, such as direct prediction of agent-error pairs and agent-first failure attribution, rely on local logs of agents and miss global failures that only manifest over full interaction trajectories, such as cross-step inconsistencies and inter-agent coordination errors. Moreover, directly predicting failures induces a large combinatorial search space, hindering fine-grained attribution. To address these challenges, we propose VerifyMAS, a hypothesis verification framework for agent failure attribution. Instead of directly predicting faulty agents and error types, VerifyMAS formulates and verifies failure hypotheses against full trajectories. This verification-based approach decomposes attribution into trajectory-level error validation and fine-grained agent localization, providing an error-first attribution approach that captures global failure patterns while substantially reducing the search space. We further introduce a hypothesis-based data construction strategy grounded in a structured error taxonomy and fine-tune a specialized LLM verifier model for trajectory-level failure verification and agent attribution. Experiments on Aegis-Bench and Who&When show that VerifyMAS consistently improves diverse backbone models, including open-source Qwen and API-based GPT models, outperforming prior methods without sacrificing inference efficiency for long multi-agent trajectories. Code and data are available at https://github.com/mala-lab/VerifyMAS.
comment: Accepted by NeurIPS2026
♻ ☆ Heads of Security: Learned Attention Gates Improve Prompt Injection Robustness
Igor Shilov, Xiaoxue Yang, Alexander Panfilov, Evgenii Kortukov, Matthieu Meeus, Peter Romov, Wojciech Samek, Jonas Geiping, Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye
We introduce Heads of Security (HoS), a prompt injection defense that enforces instruction-data separation via a small set of learned per-head attention gates. HoS learns how each head should redistribute attention between trusted and untrusted tokens, enabling models to reason over untrusted content without following injected instructions. We evaluate HoS on Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and GPT-OSS-20B. We compare it against SecAlign++, a state-of-the-art finetuning-based defense, and ASIDE, a defense that, like ours, builds instruction-data separation into the model architecture. We show that HoS offers greater robustness to adaptive attacks, better performance on standard utility benchmarks, and matches top performance on standard agentic prompt injection benchmarks. More specifically, the black-box RL-Hammer attack reaches 97% ASR against GPT-OSS-20B and 85% against SecAlign, but only 10% against HoS. Claudini, a state-of-the-art white-box attack, strengthened against HoS through autoresearch, requires 3 times more FLOPs to reach the same ASR on HoS as it does on GPT-OSS-20B or SecAlign. HoS preserves base-model utility across standard multiple-choice benchmarks and prompting setups, whereas SecAlign and ASIDE degrade in few-shot settings. On agentic benchmarks with static attacks, HoS and SecAlign perform similarly and substantially improve the security-utility trade-off over the base model. ASIDE struggles with tool use, achieving only 10% utility. These results show that prompt injection robustness can be achieved and improved through targeted attention interventions.
♻ ☆ Minimizing Modality Gap from the Input Side: Your Speech LLM Can Be a Prosody-Aware Text LLM NeurIPS 2026
Speech large language models (SLMs) are typically built from text large language model (TLM) checkpoints, yet they still suffer from a substantial modality gap. Prior work has mainly attempted to reduce this gap from the output side by making speech generation more text-like, but the gap remains. We argue that the key remaining bottleneck lies on the input side. We propose TextPro-SLM, an SLM that makes spoken input more closely resemble that of a prosody-aware text LLM. TextPro-SLM combines WhisperPro, a unified speech encoder that produces synchronized text tokens and prosody embeddings, with an LLM backbone trained to preserve the semantic capabilities of the original TLM while learning paralinguistic understanding. Experiments show that TextPro-SLM achieves the lowest modality gap among leading SLMs at both 3B and 7B scales, while also delivering strong overall performance on paralinguistic understanding tasks. These gains are achieved with only roughly 1,000 hours of LLM training audio, suggesting that reducing the modality gap from the input side is both effective and data-efficient. Code is available at https://github.com/dreamtheater123/TextPro-SLM
comment: Accepted by NeurIPS 2026
♻ ☆ AgentCollab: A Self-Evaluation-Driven Collaboration Paradigm for Efficient LLM Agents
Wenbo Gao, Renxi Liu, Xian Wang, Fang Guo, Shuai Yang, Xi Chen, Hui-Ling Zhen, Hanting Chen, Weizhe Lin, Xiaosong Li, Yaoyuan Wang
Autonomous agents powered by large language models (LLMs) perform complex tasks through long-horizon reasoning and tool interaction, where a fundamental trade-off arises between execution efficiency and reasoning robustness. Models at different capability-cost levels offer complementary advantages: lower-cost models enable fast execution but may struggle on difficult reasoning segments, while stronger models provide more robust reasoning at higher computational cost. We present AgentCollab, a self-driven collaborative inference framework that dynamically coordinates models with different reasoning capacities during agent execution. Instead of relying on external routing modules, the framework uses the agent's own self-reflection signal to determine whether the current reasoning trajectory is making meaningful progress, and escalates control to a stronger reasoning tier only when necessary. To further stabilize long-horizon execution, we introduce a difficulty-aware cumulative escalation strategy that allocates additional reasoning budget based on recent failure signals. In our experiments, we instantiate this framework using a two-level small-large model setting. Experiments on diverse multi-step agent benchmarks show that AgentCollab consistently improves the accuracy-efficiency Pareto frontier of LLM agents. The code is available at https://github.com/SparkEngineAI/AgentFlashInfer.
♻ ☆ Ctrl-G: Controlling Structural and Interaction Exposure in Knowledge Graph Augmented LLM Reasoning
Knowledge graphs (KGs) provide structured evidence for Web question answering with large language models (LLMs), but sending retrieved evidence to a remote LLM can expose sensitive graph information. Existing privacy treatments use entity anonymization and relation-centric abstraction to preserve reasoning cues, but transmitted topology remains visible and disclosure accumulates across repeated calls. Distinctive topology can support re-identification of masked entities (structural exposure), while successive calls accumulate additional paths and exploration traces into a broader view of the KG (interaction exposure). Simply sending less evidence is insufficient because restricted, stepwise views may omit the bridge paths required for multi-hop reasoning. To address this, we propose Ctrl-G, to the best of our knowledge the first KG-RAG framework to jointly control structural and interaction exposure to a remote LLM while supporting accurate multi-hop reasoning. To control structural exposure, Ctrl-G locally constructs query-conditioned sanitized views through structural aggregation and pruning, limiting the graph evidence transmitted to a remote LLM. A hierarchical controller couples remote planning with local connected-path exploration across topic entities, using question indicators and retrieved experience to prune candidates while grounding and verifying retained evidence against the original KG. To control interaction exposure, local experience memory reuses abstract, verified reasoning traces to guide exploration modes and depths and gate remote LLM calls, reducing repeated disclosure across questions. Ctrl-G achieves the highest accuracy among the compared methods on five of six benchmarks, exceeding the strongest baseline by up to 13.8 points across model configurations.
♻ ☆ The Depth Flow of Token Representations Is Nonlinear and Does Not Descend Its Own Density NeurIPS 2026
A token's representation is carried through the network layer by layer. The whole vocabulary carried together forms a flow. We fit this flow's equation of motion as a discrete Langevin model over corpus-mean trajectories of Pythia-160M and Pythia-410M, and score the predicted steps on held-out tokens. Linear maps are often used as cheap surrogates for a layer. The flow they summarize is not linear: a quadratic drift beats the linear map at every transition of both models, and the Kramers-Moyal estimator agrees wherever its neighborhoods stay local. At full width, the step of a mean trajectory is nearly affine, 3% non-affine, while the step of an individual state is not, 17%. We then characterize the flow further. First, we show that it does not descend its own log-density, whatever the diffusion matrix. The drift instead descends a potential that is not the density. Second, the rotational component is not negligible, 4 to 45% of the explainable drift, and it is the antisymmetric part of the linear map. Finally, a token keeps its angular rank and its local-density rank across all thirteen layers, on two corpora and both models.
comment: Accepted at the NeurIPS 2026 Workshop on Symmetry and Geometry in Neural Representations (NeurReps), Proceedings Track, to appear in PMLR. 9 pages plus appendix. Code and results: https://github.com/hotherio/paper-neurreps-depth-flow
♻ ☆ A Survey on Long-Term Memory Security in LLM Agents: Attacks, Defenses, and Governance Across the Memory Lifecycle EMNLP 2026
The emergence of writable, cross-session persistent memory in LLM agents introduces a qualitatively different threat landscape from conventional input-centric security concerns, characterized by three properties: persistence, statefulness, and propagation. To systematically characterize this landscape, we propose a Memory Lifecycle Framework that organizes attacks, defenses, and their cross-phase dependencies along two axes: six lifecycle phases (Write, Store, Retrieve, Execute, Share & Propagate, Forget & Rollback) and four security objectives (Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Governance). This analysis in turn exposes the need for explicit security requirements at the system level, motivating Verifiable Memory Governance (VMG), a framework of five architectural primitives for specifying and evaluating auditable, recoverable control over memory state within declared system and threat-model boundaries. Our analysis motivates integrating provenance, versioning, and policy-aware retention with retrieval and execution defenses to support auditable prevention, containment, and recovery across the lifecycle.
comment: 22 pages, 3 figures, 4 tables. Expanded arXiv version; conference version accepted to EMNLP 2026. Added 21 references and clarified security objectives, recovery semantics, and VMG evaluation. Revision notes in Appendix F
♻ ☆ SpectRAG: Weighted Chunk Graphs for Token-Budgeted Context Selection in Multi-Hop Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems ground large language models (LLMs) by retrieving external evidence and conditioning generation on the retrieved context. Although dense retrieval is effective for local semantic matching, independently ranked retrieval can return redundant passages, miss cross-chunk dependencies, and provide incomplete evidence for multi-hop reasoning. We propose SpectRAG, a spectral graph-augmented retrieval framework that combines hybrid candidate seeding, weighted chunk graph construction, graph-based expansion, spectral relevance propagation, and token-budgeted context selection. Document chunks are represented by dense semantic embeddings and graph-spectral coordinates derived from a weighted chunk graph whose edges encode semantic similarity, document adjacency, section hierarchy, shared entities, citation links, and similarity between LLM-generated utility questions. At query time, SpectRAG builds a high-recall seed set using exact inner-product search and hybrid relevance signals, expands it over the chunk graph, re-scores candidates using graph proximity and spectral information, and assembles the final context under a fixed token budget. The goal is not merely to retrieve individually similar chunks, but to construct a context that is relevant, diverse, structurally connected, and sufficient for grounded reasoning. Experiments on MultiHopRAG, UltraDomain, and long-document question-answering settings show that SpectRAG improves broad evidence recovery and achieves competitive generation quality against dense, hybrid, HyDE, LightRAG, and NaiveRAG baselines. The results further indicate that graph-spectral structure is particularly useful for inference-oriented and cross-document retrieval, while highlighting trade-offs in early precision, computational cost, and domain-dependent performance.
comment: 26 pages, 5 figures, 10 tables. This work is intended for submission to an IEEE journal
♻ ☆ SIRF: A Spec-Internalized Risk Foundation Model for Industrial Content Risk Control EMNLP 2026
For industrial content risk control, the real deployment constraint is not average accuracy but how much risk can be auto-handled under high precision and second-level latency. We present SIRF (Spec-Internalized Risk Foundation Model), which internalizes a platform's complex policies, synthesized without additional human annotation via EntiGraph, MAGA rewriting and account-level chain-of-thought (CoT), into the weights via continued pretraining (CPT), so rules are applied at high precision under an ultra-low-latency, verdict-only deployment. A controlled same-source comparison (Qwen3-8B-SFT vs. SIRF-8B-SFT, identical policy injection and verdict-only output form, differing only in policy-grounded CPT) attributes the gain to internalization: SIRF-8B-SFT reaches 71.3% Black Recall@P95, +15.1pp over the baseline, using only ~70M CPT tokens without harming general ability, and among included, logprob-available models under this interface it matches or exceeds far larger systems. SIRF is deployed as a tree-model adjudication layer (20% more mis-penalized samples recovered) and transfers to a freezing scenario at low cost (~70% relative mis-penalization reduction).
comment: 14 pages, 12 figures. Accepted at the Industry Track of EMNLP 2026
♻ ☆ A Unified Per-Token Gating Family for On-Policy Distillation: FKL/RKL Mixing with Multi-Channel and Bias Coefficients EMNLP 2026
Per-token gating of forward/reverse KL losses has become a standard technique for on-policy knowledge distillation (OPD), but existing methods such as EOPD (Jin et al., 2026) and ToDi (Jung et al., 2025) each fix a single gating signal and a single gating direction, and the two have never been compared directly. We introduce a four-coefficient parameterization lambda_t = sigma(a * h_t + b * u(x) + c + d * gap_t) in which direction-aligned proxies of EOPD and ToDi appear as one-dimensional (1D) restrictions, and which adds multi-channel composition and an explicit bias as further degrees of freedom. On TweetEval (Barbieri et al., 2020) emotion and hate, with a Qwen3-32B teacher and a Qwen3-4B student, configurations in the full family reach higher accuracy than the matched-magnitude single-channel (entropy-only / gap-only) 1D restrictions in 33 of 36 comparable cells, and a 26-cell mean-match isolation experiment places dynamic gating ahead of effective-KL-matched static baselines in 19 of 26 cells. Because cells share training data, models, and parameter substructure, we report both counts as exploratory aggregate directional evidence rather than as independent hypothesis tests. Targeted three-seed paired replications of the nine headline comparisons singled out by that sweep -- including a third task, offensive -- are directionally consistent, but individually smaller than the single-seed estimates and not significant at n=3. We therefore present the parameterization primarily as a shared coordinate system for comparing per-token gating designs in short-output classification OPD.
comment: Accepted at the Findings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2026 Findings)
♻ ☆ EvoMemBench: Benchmarking Agent Memory from a Self-Evolving Perspective NeurIPS 2026
Yuyao Wang, Zhongjian Zhang, Mo Chi, Kaichi Yu, Yuhan Li, Miao Peng, Bing Tong, Chen Zhang, Yan Zhou, Jia Li
Recent benchmarks for Large Language Model (LLM) agents mainly evaluate reasoning, planning, and execution. However, memory is also essential for agents, as it enables them to store, update, and retrieve information over time. This ability remains under-evaluated, largely because existing benchmarks do not provide a systematic way to assess memory mechanisms. In this paper, we study agent memory from a self-evolving perspective and introduce EvoMemBench, a unified benchmark organized along two axes: memory scope (in-episode vs. cross-episode) and memory content (knowledge-oriented vs. execution-oriented). We compare 15 representative memory methods with strong long-context baselines under a standardized protocol. Results show that current memory systems are still far from a general solution: long-context baselines remain highly competitive, memory helps most when the current context is insufficient or tasks are difficult, and no single memory form works consistently across all settings. Retrieval-based methods remain strong for knowledge-intensive settings, whereas procedural and long-term memory methods are more effective for execution-oriented tasks when their stored experience matches the task structure. We hope EvoMemBench facilitates future research on more effective memory systems for LLM-based agents. Our dataset and code are available at https://github.com/DSAIL-Memory/EvoMemBench.
comment: Accepted by NeurIPS 2026
♻ ☆ Arapai: An Offline-First LLM Architecture for Adaptive Learning in Low-Connectivity Environments
Artificial intelligence and large language models (LLMs) are transforming educational technology by enabling conversational tutoring, personalised explanations, and inquiry-driven learning. However, most AI-based learning systems rely on continuous internet connectivity and cloud-based computation, limiting their use in bandwidth-constrained environments. This paper presents Arapai, an offline-first large language model architecture designed for AI-assisted learning in low-connectivity settings. The system performs all inference locally using quantized language models and incorporates hardware-aware model selection to enable deployment on low-specification, CPU-only devices. By removing dependence on cloud infrastructure, the system provides curriculum-aligned explanations and structured academic support through natural-language interaction. To support learners at different educational stages, the system includes adaptive response levels that generate explanations at varying levels of complexity: Simple English, Lower Secondary, Upper Secondary, and Technical. The system was evaluated with 120 students and 9 instructors from secondary and tertiary institutions under limited-connectivity conditions. Results indicate stable operation on legacy hardware, acceptable response times of 1-3 seconds for typical queries, and positive user perceptions of its effectiveness in supporting self-directed learning.
comment: The statement that "The system was evaluated with 120 students and 9 instructors from secondary and tertiary institutions" is incorrect
♻ ☆ Natural Language Actor-Critic: Scalable Off-Policy Learning in Language Space NeurIPS 2026
Large language model (LLM) agents -- LLMs that dynamically interact with an environment over long horizons -- have become an increasingly important area of research, enabling automation in complex tasks involving tool-use, web browsing, and dialogue with people. In the absence of expert demonstrations, training LLM agents has relied on policy gradient methods that optimize LLM policies with respect to an (often sparse) reward function. However, in long-horizon tasks with sparse rewards, learning from trajectory-level rewards can be noisy, leading to training that is unstable and has high sample complexity. Furthermore, policy improvement hinges on discovering better actions through exploration, which can be difficult when actions lie in natural language space. In this paper, we propose Natural Language Actor-Critic (NLAC), a novel actor-critic algorithm that trains LLM policies using a generative LLM critic that produces natural language rather than scalar values. This approach leverages the inherent strengths of LLMs to provide a richer and more actionable training signal; particularly, in tasks with large, open-ended action spaces, natural language explanations for why an action is suboptimal can be immensely useful for LLM policies to reason how to improve their actions, without relying on random exploration. Furthermore, our approach can be trained off-policy without policy gradients, offering a more data-efficient and stable alternative to existing on-policy methods. We present results on a mixture of reasoning, web browsing, and tool-use with dialogue tasks, demonstrating that NLAC shows promise in outperforming existing training approaches and offers a more scalable and stable training paradigm for LLM agents.
comment: NeurIPS 2026; 28 pages, 5 figures
♻ ☆ Enhancing Safety of Large Language Models via Embedding Space Separation
Safety alignment does not fully prevent large language models (LLMs) from producing harmful content under adversarial attacks. We observe that existing attack methods typically move harmful embeddings toward regions of harmless embeddings. This motivates us to explore whether increasing the distance between harmful and harmless embeddings can improve the safety of LLMs, since greater separation requires attacks to make larger embedding shifts, which can destroy semantics. We propose Embedding Space Separation (ES2), a fine-tuning method that increases the distance between harmful and harmless embeddings. However, maximizing this distance alone can damage LLMs' capabilities. Thus, we use two regularization losses: an embedding anchor loss keeps harmless embeddings close in direction to those of a frozen base model and a KL-divergence loss keeps output distributions on harmless prompts close to those of the base model. Our experimental results demonstrate that ES2 has excellent defensive performance against various attack methods. LLMs fine-tuned with ES2 retain general capabilities comparable to those of the baseline models, though some performance degradation is observed on certain tasks. Our results indicate that ES2 is an effective way to enhance the safety of large language models, while maintaining comparable performance on general capabilities.
♻ ☆ Holistic Diversity Management in LLM-Guided Evolutionary Search
LLM-guided evolutionary search iteratively selects existing programs, uses LLMs as mutation operators to generate a new program, and evaluates it to guide subsequent search. To preserve diversity and reduce the risk of premature convergence, it often adopts the island model, in which groups of programs, called islands, evolve separately. However, this structure alone does not guarantee distinct search directions, as islands may start from similar programs or converge toward similar solutions during evolution. This suggests that diversity must be considered throughout the search process, from initializing islands with distinct programs to developing island trajectories and sharing discoveries across islands. To this end, we propose HoliDivEvolve , a holistic approach to establishing and effectively utilizing island diversity throughout evolutionary search. Specifically, we introduce diverse initialization to establish different initial programs, trajectory adaptive island selection to allocate computation based on current score, recent growth, and the remaining search budget, and growth adaptive migration to share alternative ideas across islands. Experiments across diverse benchmarks show that HoliDivEvolve achieves competitive performance on most evaluated tasks. We further conduct controlled analyses to examine how our design choices affect search behavior and final performance.
♻ ☆ M$^\star$: Every Task Deserves Its Own Memory Harness NeurIPS 2026
Wenbo Pan, Shujie Liu, Xiangyang Zhou, Xianlong Wang, Shiwei Zhang, Bingjing Xu, Wanlu Shi, Xiaohua Jia
Large language model agents rely on a memory harness to write, organize, retrieve, and use past experience. A harness that works for one task often fails on another, because conversations, embodied planning, and expert reasoning require different storage and retrieval behavior. To address this limitation, we introduce Mstar, a method that automatically discovers task-optimized memory programs through reflective code evolution. Specifically, Mstar operationalizes a memory harness as an executable Python memory program that defines the Schema, Logic, and Instruction, and optimizes these components jointly. We evaluate Mstar on four tasks covering conversation, embodied planning, and specialized reasoning. Our results demonstrate that Mstar improves performance over existing baselines across all evaluated tasks. Furthermore, the evolved memory programs exhibit structurally distinct processing mechanisms for each evaluated domain. These findings suggest that every task benefits from its own memory harness, and that memory-program search provides a concrete way to discover it.
comment: NeurIPS 2026 (poster). Code: https://github.com/wbopan/mstar ; Live demo: https://mstar.wenbo.io
♻ ☆ 4-Tensor Attention Model for Semantic Physical Reality
We describe a 4-tensor attention model that predicts the next semantic state of a scene, for video generation and robot planning. A window of states has positions (x, t) and two fibers, a semantic fiber and a temporal-context fiber, and one softmax normalizes attention jointly over the window. Frames and an agent's situation are written as those states; the encoder, the renderer, and the planner remain outside the update. To test the update on its own, we train on ROCStories, where each window poses the same next-sentence task at the semantic layer. On the validation split, with one seed per setting, the last-sentence cross-entropy on the three matched settings is lower for the 4-tensor model than for a free-running one-dimensional transformer by 5.3% at H=2, L=2, by 2.6% at H=4, L=2, and by 2.4% at H=4, L=3. At H=4, L=2 the parameter counts are nearly the same, 172.5M and 175.9M. On the same two GPUs that 4-tensor run finished in 2.4 hours and the baseline run in 45.2 hours; the baseline is trained by free-running decoding, one sequential forward pass per target token.
comment: Updated the finished H=2, L=2 one-step baseline and added the T=3 rollout of S(3) and S(4)
♻ ☆ Expected Harm: Rethinking Safety Evaluation of (Mis)Aligned LLMs NeurIPS 2026
Current evaluations of LLM safety predominantly rely on severity-based taxonomies to assess the harmfulness of models' responses to malicious queries. We argue that this formulation requires re-examination as it implicitly equates model output with realized harm while neglecting Execution Likelihood-the conditional probability of a threat being realized by a real-world actor given a model's response. In this work, we introduce Expected Harm, a metric that weights the severity of a jailbreak by its execution likelihood, modeled as a function of execution cost. Through empirical analysis of state-of-the-art models, we reveal a systematic Inverse Risk Calibration: models disproportionately exhibit stronger refusal behaviors for low-likelihood (high-cost) threats while remaining vulnerable to high-likelihood (low-cost) queries. Mechanistically, we first provide an analysis using linear probing, revealing that while refusal mechanisms linearly separate queries by severity, they do not use execution likelihood as an indicator for refusal. Then, we use Olmo-3's open-source staged checkpoints to trace the root cause of miscalibration to the Supervised Fine Tuning (SFT) training data distribution (82.8% of safety examples at cost levels 0-1) and show that cost representations are weak from the SFT stage onward. Finally, we demonstrate that this miscalibration creates a vulnerability: by exploiting this property, we increase the attack success rate of existing jailbreaks by up to $2\times$.
comment: Accepted to NeurIPS 2026 Evaluations & Dataset Track (spotlight paper)
♻ ☆ SOPO: Socratic Guided Policy Optimization for Span-Level Hallucination Detection
Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread adoption in various natural language processing tasks, but suffer from hallucination issues where they generate unfaithful or inconsistent content. While Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has shown promising applications in reasoning tasks, its application to span-level hallucination detection is challenged by localization ambiguity, reward sparsity on hard examples, and uncontrolled length inflation. To address these issues, we introduce Socratic Guided Policy Optimization (SOPO), a multi-turn RL framework for robust hallucination detection. The key innovation of SOPO is a Socratic feedback mechanism, where a teacher model guides the reasoning trajectories during rollout by providing indirect hints inferred from the ground truth. This teacher-guided approach enables the model to generate more effective reasoning trajectories for hard examples, thus alleviating reward sparsity. Furthermore, we incorporate Turn-based Advantage Scaling to penalize verbosity bias, encouraging the model to develop efficient and autonomous reasoning capabilities. Empirical results on RAGTruth demonstrate that SOPO (4B) achieves state-of-the-art performance, surpassing leading proprietary models (e.g., GPT-5) and standard RL baselines, while obtaining higher reported mean scores than GRPO on four out-of-domain benchmarks, with mixed evidence against CAPO. We release our training and evaluation code alongside the 1.7B and 4B SOPO models at https://github.com/patsnap/SOPO.
comment: 24 pages, 11 figures
♻ ☆ Unlimited OCR Works 2
Shu Wei, Jingjing Wu, Qunyi Xie, Lingshu Zhang, Xiangcheng Du, Yannian Fu, Mengjie Wang, Zuyi Wang, Zhichao Liu, Yangliu Xu, Youyang Yin, Huanhuan Liu, YY, Yi Yang
Unlimited OCR ushers the era of long-horizon parsing, substantially mitigating the growth of working memory as document lengthens. However, as document length scales to hundreds of pages, the visual context grows substantially, sharply increasing the computational cost of each decoding step and limiting the scalability of ultra-long document parsing. Inspired by human book transcription via localized focus without re-scanning preceding pages, we introduce Unlimited OCR 2, a document parsing model that looks only at what it transcribes. Building on Unlimited OCR, we upgrade all the decoder attention modules to Sparse Reference Sliding Window Attention (SR-SWA), bounding active reference tokens to a fixed capacity and thus sustaining constant computational costs across arbitrarily long documents. By combining SR-SWA with Unlimited-Horizon Decoding Paradigm, Unlimited OCR 2 enables document parsing over virtually unlimited lengths without prohibitive memory overhead. At the hundred-page scale, Unlimited OCR 2 achieves 7.0$\times$ and 5.6$\times$ per-step speedups over Full Attention and R-SWA, respectively. Furthermore, it delivers state-of-the-art end-to-end performance on both MPDocBench and MarathonDocBench, our newly proposed benchmark targeting hundred-page document parsing. Ultimately, the capacity for uninterrupted, one-shot document parsing signifies a fundamental paradigm shift into the OCR 3.0 era.
♻ ☆ From Association to Causation: Improving Retrieval Precision of Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Causal Relations and an Attention Mechanism
Jing Liu, Yongxing Qi, Muchen Jiang, Chengnan Hu, Qingqing Peng, Haoming Wang, Yuqing Wang, Yang Yu, Xu Zhang, Ting Wu
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) grounds LLM generation on retrieved documents, but the standard terminal retrieval stage--dense-vector similarity, optionally followed by reranking--often returns documents that share keywords with the query without containing the needed information, a failure mode that grows with the knowledge base. We trace it to a conceptual gap: similarity captures only associational relations, whereas the documents that matter are linked to the query causally. We model the terminal retrieval stage with a causal graph grounded in Reichenbach's common cause principle: the keywords shared by the query and a retrieved document form a latent common cause A, and the document's residual keywords form a latent set B linking the document to the ideal output. Since a retrieved document is a collider (A -> d <- B), retrieval itself opens an associational path between the query and B, which licenses a training-free, attention-style re-scoring rule: the cosine similarity between the query embedding and the weighted centroid embedding of B. Unlike causality-enhanced RAG variants that model causal relations inside the knowledge content, our graph models the causal structure of the retrieval process itself. On a real 471-document enterprise knowledge base, the method promotes a relevant guideline from rank 6 to the top 3; on a controlled diagnostic corpus reproducing the keyword-stuffing regime, it improves the mean target rank from 2.88 to 1.25, while a trained cross-encoder reranker barely helps (2.63). Conversely, on three BEIR benchmarks the score underperforms the similarity baseline, delineating the applicability boundary: the method guards the keyword-stuffing regime of growing proprietary knowledge bases and complements neural rerankers; a corpus-level calibration gate selects the correct regime with >= 95% reliability. A fully local testbed demonstrates deployability.
comment: 16 pages, 2 figures, 4 tables, 1 algorithm. Code available at https://github.com/Silk-Road/causal-rag-rerank
♻ ☆ Controllable User Simulation
Using offline datasets to evaluate conversational agents often fails to cover rare scenarios or to support testing new policies. This has motivated the use of controllable user simulators for targeted, counterfactual evaluation, typically implemented by prompting or fine-tuning large language models. In this work, we formalize controllable simulation as a causal inference problem. By bridging natural language evaluation with off-policy evaluation methodology, we show that the standard practice of training simulators via supervised fine-tuning on post-hoc trajectory labels yields a structurally biased model. Specifically, these labels are inextricably coupled to the data-generating behavior policy, injecting a look-ahead bias that breaks causal consistency. Furthermore, we prove that under policy shift this failure causes the variance of evaluation metrics to explode geometrically, a phenomenon we term controllability collapse. To restore causal consistency, we establish theoretical conditions for accurate simulation and propose practical training mitigations: a priori controls, step-wise dynamic controls, and direct policy-conditioned learning. Empirical evaluation confirms that while standard global controls distort conversational distributions and collapse behavioral diversity, our causally grounded simulators eliminate look-ahead bias, preserve natural variance, and exhibit robust zero-shot generalization to unseen agent behaviors.
comment: Accepted Neurips 2026
♻ ☆ What Does a Harness Repair? Three Preregistered Studies Around a Longevity-Tuned Language Model
A harness search around a frozen longevity-tuned 1.7B model reported a rescue. An audit found that the gain came from rows the start left unparsed, that the caller sent each row's reference answer as an assistant turn, and that replication through the same pipeline missed it. Is a harness's gain more than a constant answer would give? We preregistered three studies and report every endpoint. In the first two, thinking off raised test accuracy over a capped thinking setting in 7 of 12 cells, mostly on rows the cap left unparsed. It was not meaningfully worse than a rescue in 7 of 9 small-model test cells or than four GEPA harnesses at 1.7B. Replication reproduced an injected defect's distortion in 9 of 20 evaluable cases (7 fixed by design). At 14B, two GEPA harnesses beat thinking off by 34 points on test but were not detectably above the strongest constant label, and answered "Yes" in 94.6% and 98.2% of parsed mortality answers on test. In the third study (SmolLM3-3B, base Qwen3-1.7B), GEPA beat the constant on FPB (confirmatory, both partitions); thinking off was not meaningfully worse than any BoolQ harness, and 3 of 4 MMLU-Pro searches kept their seed (the fourth inconclusive on test). On Autocast (exploratory), the harnesses were within 0.7 points of the constant and gave one label in 93.1% to 96.8% of parsed answers, both on test. On questions about the input or about knowledge (FPB, BoolQ, MMLU-Pro), GEPA beat the constant or found no clear gain over thinking off; on questions that ask for a prediction (14B mortality, descriptive; Autocast, exploratory), the harness ended near the constant and gave one label almost throughout while its gain over thinking off looked large. The constant label told the two apart wherever the gain was large. This rests on few tasks that also differ in label skew, number of labels and task type, so it is not shown to depend on the kind of question.
comment: 90 pages, 3 figures, 77 tables. v3 adds a third preregistered study (SmolLM3-3B and base Qwen3-1.7B on BoolQ, FPB and MMLU-Pro; Autocast exploratory) and a check of the selected harness texts, and withholds row-like passages that v1 and v2 printed. Ancillary files in anc/: frozen preregistrations, addenda (row keys withheld), aggregate reports, README, sha256sum list